Archived Solid State Physics: Hall Effect + Semiconductor Lab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying potential errors in a lab experiment related to the Hall Effect and semiconductors, which resulted in an approximately 80% error rate. Key issues identified include difficulty in adjusting the potentiometer to achieve a zero voltage starting point and the inconsistency of the magnetic field strength across the wafer. Additional errors mentioned involve the effects of using a non-consistent magnetic pole, which can lead to unreliable data. It is suggested that measuring the magnetic field at various points can help estimate the impact of these errors. Clear explanations of the errors and their calculations are recommended for better understanding.
Turion
Messages
145
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The lab is attached. I've also attached the pre-lab just for the diagram.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Can anyone think of some good errors for this lab?

We ended up with ~80% error.

I've thought of two:
1. Adjusting the potentiometer so that the width of the conductor would start with 0 voltage was very difficult.
2. The magnetic field was strongest in the center but was weak on the sides of the wafer. This caused some uncertainty.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Turion said:

Homework Statement



The lab is attached. I've also attached the pre-lab just for the diagram.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Can anyone think of some good errors for this lab?

We ended up with ~80% error.

I've thought of two:
1. Adjusting the potentiometer so that the width of the conductor would start with 0 voltage was very difficult.
2. The magnetic field was strongest in the center but was weak on the sides of the wafer. This caused some uncertainty.
There are some thermo-magnetic effects associated with the Hall Effect, namely The Nernst Effect, the Righi-Leduc Effect, and the Ettingshausen Effect.

Some other errors I remember from having done the Hall Effect are mostly with regard to the magnet. Not using a consistent pole will result in non-consistent data. As you have pointed out, the field is strongest in the center and you can estimate the effect of this error by measuring the magnetic field at different points around the magnet.

Explaining exactly what error you're calculating and how you calculated it might be helpful.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top