Solution for u_x+2xy^2u_y=0 with Initial Condition u(x,0)=\phi (x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter oyolasigmaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the partial differential equation (PDE) u_x + 2xy^2u_y = 0 with the initial condition u(x,0) = φ(x). The problem is situated within the context of well-posed problems, focusing on aspects such as existence, uniqueness, and stability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the general solution to the PDE and the challenges in applying the initial condition. There is a consideration of limits as y approaches 0 and the implications for the function u(x,0). Questions about the uniqueness of the solution are also raised.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between the general solution and the initial condition, suggesting that the limit as y approaches 0 is crucial. There is an acknowledgment of the potential non-uniqueness of the solution, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenge of interpreting the initial condition when y=0, which may affect the understanding of the solution's behavior and uniqueness.

oyolasigmaz
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
PDE--initial condition

Homework Statement


Solve the equation u_x+2xy^2u_y=0 with u(x,0)=\phi (x). Strauss PDE 2nd ed., chapter 1.5, exercise 6.


Homework Equations


The question is under "Well-Posed Problems" section, so this might be about existence, uniqueness, or stability.


The Attempt at a Solution


I can easily solve the first order PDE without the constaint, and get the solution as u(x,y)=f(x^2+\frac{1}{y}). However, when I try to apply the initial condition, since y=0 there, I got stuck. I cannot really interpret this situation, so I need your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bumping, could not find the answer yet.
 


I THINK it's fairly simple. To determine u(x,0) from your general solution you need to take the limit as y->0. That's either the limit f(z) as z goes to plus or minus infinity (depending on which side of the x-axis you are on). That means you need an f that has that limit at infinity. Once you get that what kind of function must u(x,0) be? Finally, ask yourself about uniqueness. I think that's it.
 


Alright, I believe I got it and it seems quite simple now. So the function is not unique and that was what we were looking for I guess, conceptually.

Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K