Solution of Schrodinger equation for free electron

u_know_who
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, i am beginning elementary Quantum Mechanics as my course. While studying one question arise in my mind :

In the solution of Schrodinger wave equation there are two parts.

ψ=A*exp(jKx) + B*exp(-jkx). (for confined electron)

But when dealing with free electron the solution is of the following pattern :

ψ = A*exp(jkx) or ψ = B*exp(-jkx).

Can anyone tell me the reason behind that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the power of the exponential describes the direction of the evolution.
here what you have is a solution that either describes a particle traveling in the positive or negative x direction. This is fine, because there is no confining potential, so the solution only travels one way through space. In the previous solution the particle is in some potential, so its motion must be considered in both dircetions.
 
There are ALWAYS 2 linearly independent solutions to the Schrödinger equation, because it's a second order ODE. Which one "survives" and describes quantum states is a matter of rightfully implementing boundary/limit conditions which are necessary to make the hamiltonian or the momentum operator (essentially) self-adjoint.
 
Thank you raymo and dextercioby.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
143
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top