Solution to the Two-Body Problem: Cross-Product and Dot-Product Integration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the two-body problem using cross-product and dot-product integration methods. The initial equation involves the acceleration of a body influenced by gravitational force, leading to the momentum vector's definition. The solution process includes taking the cross-product with the momentum vector and integrating with respect to time, but participants express confusion over the integration steps and the treatment of variables. There is a notable disagreement on the integration results, particularly regarding the treatment of the gravitational term and the variables involved. The conversation highlights the complexity of deriving the position and angle functions over time, emphasizing the need for careful variable management during integration.
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Two-body problem given as
$$\ddot{\textbf{r}}+\frac{GM}{r^2}\frac{\textbf{r}}{r}=0$$
$$\textbf{h}=\textbf{r}\times\dot{\textbf{r}}$$
where the moment of the momentum vector mh

Homework Equations


The vector solution to the above equation may be obtained by first taking the cross-product with the constant h and integrating once with respect to time. This yields
$$\dot{\textbf{r}}\times\textbf{h}=GM(\frac{\textbf{r}}{r}+\textbf{e})$$

The final solution to the equation is then obtained by taking the dot product of above equation with r, is
$$r=\frac{h^2/(GM)}{1+ecos\theta}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea what the author is doing. How does cross product with the momentum and then dot product with r solve the equation?

I try following his step but I get a different integration result
$$\dot{\textbf{r}}\times\textbf{h}=GM(\frac{\textbf{r}}{r^3}t\times\textbf{h}+\textbf{e})$$
I have no idea how his integration w.r.t. time for the GM/r2 reduces it to GM/r and how to cross product GM/r2 with h since they are unknown variables?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the objective here? To find ##r(t)## and ##\theta(t)##? If so, the solution is well-known...Landau / Lifshitz "Mechanics" has a good summary if you've never seen it.
 
TimeRip496 said:
I try following his step but I get a different integration result
$$\dot{\textbf{r}}\times\textbf{h}=GM(\frac{\textbf{r}}{r^3}t\times\textbf{h}+\textbf{e})$$
How did you get the first term on the right: ##GM(\frac{\textbf{r}}{r^3}t\times\textbf{h}) \,##?

Keep in mind that ##\mathbf r## and ##r## are functions of time. You cannot treat them as constants when integrating with respect to time.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top