Solve Coulomb's Law 1D: Find q3 for Zero Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving three charges along the x-axis, specifically finding the position of a positive charge q3 that results in zero net force. The equations derived from Coulomb's Law are set up correctly, but the user struggles with the quadratic formula due to a calculation error. Clarification is provided that the user forgot to take the square root in their calculations, leading to confusion about the results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles to arrive at the solution. The thread concludes with the user gaining insight into their mistake and expressing gratitude for the help.
Mitchtwitchita
Messages
187
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three charges lie along the x-axis. The positive charge q1 = 10.0 x 10^-6 C is at x = 1.00 m, and the negative charge q2 = -2.00 x 10^-6 C is at the origin. Where must a positive charge q3 be placed on the x-axis so that the resultant force on it is zero?

Homework Equations



F=kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



F23 = -F13

F23 = k(-2.00 x 10^-6 C)q3/-x^2
F13 = -k(10.0 x 10^-6 C)q3/(1.0 m - x)^2

[k(-2.00 x 10^-6 C)q3/-x^2] - [k(10.0 x 10^-6 C)q3/(1.0 - x)^2] = 0
(-2.00 x 10^-6 C)/-x^2 = (10.0 x 10^-6 C)/(1.0 -x)^2
2/x^2 = 10/(1- x)^2
2 - 4x + 2x^2 = 10x^2
-8x^2 - 4x +2 = 0

My quadratic equation doesn't work out so I'm assuming there was a terrible malfunction earlier on. Can somebody please help me out with this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: First figure out what region the positive charge q3 must be in. ( x < 0; 0 < x < 1; x > 1) The field from each charge may have a different sign in different regions, which affects how you'd write the equation.
 
It's going to be left of the origin (-x). How would this affect my initial signs?
 
Mitchtwitchita said:
It's going to be left of the origin (-x). How would this affect my initial signs?
Actually your equations are fine. (I just saw the double negative.) Why do you think your quadratic doesn't work out?
 
Because I end up with 4 +/- sqr.[(-4_^2) - (4)(-8)(2)]/2 x 2
= (4 - 80)/4
= -19 which is much too high.
 
Er, I meant low in the last reply.
 
Mitchtwitchita said:
Because I end up with 4 +/- sqr.[(-4_^2) - (4)(-8)(2)]/2 x 2
= (4 - 80)/4
= -19 which is much too high.
I assume you are trying to use the quadratic formula. Try again; you're making an error somewhere.

Edit: You forgot to take the square root.
 
Is my error in the use of the quadratic formula or in the work leading up to it?
 
Mitchtwitchita said:
Is my error in the use of the quadratic formula or in the work leading up to it?
Your work is fine. You just forgot to take the square root. (See my last post.)
 
  • #10
Oooooooooh...duh. Thanks!
 
Back
Top