Solve Electrostatic Problem with Y.K.Lim Problem & Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter dingo_d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatic
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm looking at Y.K.Lim's Problems and solutions in Electromagnetism and there's one thing that's confusing me:

[PLAIN]http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/2218/capturegb.png

Homework Equations



Where does the square in r comes from? When in the beginning it says that the electric field is:

E=A\frac{e^{-br}}{r}e_r notE=A\frac{e^{-br}}{r^2}e_r

What am I missing?

And what should e_r stand for? Charge?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This E-field is not due to a single charge. It is due to a distribution of charges, so it needs not be proportional to r^2. For example, a uniformly charged plane produces uniform E-field on each side of the plane, obviously not proportional to distance^2, correct? :smile:
e_r is the unit radius vector.
 
Ok it needs not be proportional to r^2, but why did he put it then? When taking the divergence of the field?
 
Oh I see. Then it seems to me that it's a typo :wink:
 
Oh, I thought it's something new I didn't know XD
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top