Solve EM Radiation Homework: Compute E & B with Monochromatic Point Source

qoqosz
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are given monochromatic point source of EM radiation which power is P=100W. The task is to compute E(r) and B(r). We can assume that r is large enough to treat wave as a plane wave.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First of all - what for do we assume that for big r it is plane wave?
My solution to this task is:

In a sphere of radius r and thickness dr there is an amount of energy W: W = P dt = \frac{1}{\epsilon \mu} EB 4 \pi r^2 dr
Then P = \frac{1}{\epsilon \mu} EB 4 \pi r^2 c \iff EB = \ldots and so on... I can easily calculate values of E and B but still - what for is the mentioned assumption?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, why is there a factor of 1/\epsilon in your expression? Do the units make sense?

If the fields aren't those of a plane wave, then the Poynting vector \textbf{S}=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\textbf{E}\times\textbf{B} does not necessarily point in the radial direction and have magnitude EB. The fields themselves could also depend on the polar and azimuthal angles,

\implies P(r)=\oint\textbf{S}\cdot d\textbf{a}=\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\textbf{S}\cdot\hat{\textbf{r}}r^2\sin\theta d\theta d\phi\neq\frac{4\pi r^2}{\mu_0}EB

in general.
 
Ok, thanks. I used \frac{1}{\mu \epsilon} EB as an energy density not an energy flux.
 
qoqosz said:
Ok, thanks. I used \frac{1}{\mu \epsilon} EB as an energy density not an energy flux.

But that doesn't even have units of energy density...
 
You're right - I made stupid mistake :( Should be: \frac{1}{\mu c} EB
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top