MHB Solve Exponential Function: x1/2 + x-1/2 | Help & Explanation

linapril
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello! Could someone please help me answer this question, and explain how you answered it?

1. (x1/2 + x-1/2)2​Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What are you asked to do? And what steps have you made towards doing that?
 
It just says to simplify it.
I multiplied away the brackets, getting x + x, which equals 2x. But this answer's wrong apparently...
 
Yes, there are several errors in your computations. The first error, seemingly, is that you distributed the exponent over addition. This NEVER WORKS! If you don't believe me, check this out: is
$$25=5^{2}=(2+3)^{2}=2^{2}+3^{2}=4+9=13?$$
Definitely not. So this thought doesn't work. It's so common it's called the "freshman's dream". You have to write out your expression and FOIL it:
$$(x^{1/2}+x^{-1/2})^{2}=(x^{1/2}+x^{-1/2})(x^{1/2}+x^{-1/2}).$$
Now do your firsts, outers, inners, and lasts. What do you get?
 
I got the right answer, thank you so much :)
 
You're welcome! Have a good one.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top