Solve for Initial Speed: Dropping Chestnuts from a Tree

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two chestnuts dropped from a height of 10.0 m, where the first chestnut is dropped and the second is thrown down after the first has fallen 2.5 m. The objective is to determine the initial speed required for the second chestnut so that both reach the ground simultaneously, with the acceleration due to gravity provided as -9.81 m/s².

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the time it takes for the first chestnut to fall and how that relates to the second chestnut's motion. There is consideration of using different kinematic equations to find the necessary initial speed for the second chestnut.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on focusing on the time taken for the first chestnut to fall a specific distance rather than calculating its velocity after falling. There is acknowledgment of the complexity in the calculations and a suggestion to simplify the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the constraints of the problem, including the need to find a relationship between the two chestnuts' motions and the implications of using various kinematic equations. There is an emphasis on ensuring both chestnuts reach the ground at the same time.

unigal13
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



While sitting on a tree branch 10.0 m above the ground, you drop a chesnut. When the chestnut has fallen 2.5 m, you throw a second one straight down. What initial speed must you give the 2nd chestnut if they are both to reach the ground at the same time?

Other variables given: a = -9.81 m/s^2

Homework Equations



Constant acceleration equations of motion:
(all of the (f)'s and (i)'s indicate just final and initial - not multipliers)

Formula 1: v(f)^2 = v(i)^2 + 2(a)[x(f) - x(i)]

Formula 2: x(f) = x(i) + v(f)(t) + (1/2)(a)(t)^2

and maybe: x(f) = x(i) + (1/2)[v(i) + v(f)]t

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the velocity of the C1 (first chestnut) after falling 2.5 m, and then designate it v(i). Then I would make the two times equal to each other and in turn manipulate to find the required v(i) of C2.

Here is how I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m:

Using formula 1:
v(f)^2 = 2(-9.81)[7.5-10]
v(f) = -7.0 m/s

Now I have the following variables for the second part:

C1:
v(i) = -7.0 m/s
x(i) = 7.5 m
x(f) = 0 m

C2:
v(i) = ??
x(i) = 10 m
x(f) = 0 m

So, I decided to use Formula 2, manipulate to solve for time for each, and then set each equation equal to each other. However, it looks quite messy with the quadratic equations and such, so I'm guessing my approach must be wrong.
Maybe I should use the other equation I mentioned above instead? But then it would require a final velocity... I'm stumped!

Please help me out... it would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF.

You know the time C1 takes to fall the 7.5 m height ( time taken to fall 10m minus time taken to fall 2.5m). In this time, C2 falls 10m. Now which formula do you think you should use?
 


Thank you for your reply!

I think I was making things a bit too complicated.

Would it work if I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m (I got -7.0 m/s, like I showed above), then found the time it took C1 to fall from 7.5 m to 0 m, using Formula 2:

Formula 2: 0 = 7.5 + (-7.0)(t) + (1/2)(-9.81)(t)^2
When using the quadratic formula, I found time to equal 0.714 s.

Then, I subbed this time into Formula 2 again, this time to find the initial velocity for C2:

Formula 2: 0 = 10 + v(i)(0.714) + (1/2)(-9.81)(0.714)^2
I then found the velocity to be -9.1 m/s.

So is that final answer of -9.1 m/s correct?

Thank you very much to whoever replies!
 


unigal13 said:
Would it work if I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m (I got -7.0 m/s, like I showed above), then found the time it took C1 to fall from 7.5 m to 0 m, using Formula 2:

You do not have to explicitly find the speed of C1 after it has fallen 2.5m. You just need to find the time C1 takes to fall 7.5m, as I have pointed out. Nevertheless, your method is OK. I have not checked the calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
872
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
972
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K