Solve for Initial Speed: Dropping Chestnuts from a Tree

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed required for a second chestnut dropped from a tree to reach the ground simultaneously with the first chestnut. The first chestnut falls 2.5 meters before the second is thrown down, and the acceleration due to gravity is -9.81 m/s². The user initially attempted to find the velocity of the first chestnut after falling 2.5 meters and then set up equations to find the time for both chestnuts to hit the ground. After some confusion, they correctly determined the time it takes for the first chestnut to fall the remaining distance and used that to calculate the required initial speed for the second chestnut, arriving at -9.1 m/s. The approach, while initially complicated, was validated by other participants who confirmed the method was sound.
unigal13
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



While sitting on a tree branch 10.0 m above the ground, you drop a chesnut. When the chestnut has fallen 2.5 m, you throw a second one straight down. What initial speed must you give the 2nd chestnut if they are both to reach the ground at the same time?

Other variables given: a = -9.81 m/s^2

Homework Equations



Constant acceleration equations of motion:
(all of the (f)'s and (i)'s indicate just final and initial - not multipliers)

Formula 1: v(f)^2 = v(i)^2 + 2(a)[x(f) - x(i)]

Formula 2: x(f) = x(i) + v(f)(t) + (1/2)(a)(t)^2

and maybe: x(f) = x(i) + (1/2)[v(i) + v(f)]t

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the velocity of the C1 (first chestnut) after falling 2.5 m, and then designate it v(i). Then I would make the two times equal to each other and in turn manipulate to find the required v(i) of C2.

Here is how I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m:

Using formula 1:
v(f)^2 = 2(-9.81)[7.5-10]
v(f) = -7.0 m/s

Now I have the following variables for the second part:

C1:
v(i) = -7.0 m/s
x(i) = 7.5 m
x(f) = 0 m

C2:
v(i) = ??
x(i) = 10 m
x(f) = 0 m

So, I decided to use Formula 2, manipulate to solve for time for each, and then set each equation equal to each other. However, it looks quite messy with the quadratic equations and such, so I'm guessing my approach must be wrong.
Maybe I should use the other equation I mentioned above instead? But then it would require a final velocity... I'm stumped!

Please help me out... it would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF.

You know the time C1 takes to fall the 7.5 m height ( time taken to fall 10m minus time taken to fall 2.5m). In this time, C2 falls 10m. Now which formula do you think you should use?
 


Thank you for your reply!

I think I was making things a bit too complicated.

Would it work if I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m (I got -7.0 m/s, like I showed above), then found the time it took C1 to fall from 7.5 m to 0 m, using Formula 2:

Formula 2: 0 = 7.5 + (-7.0)(t) + (1/2)(-9.81)(t)^2
When using the quadratic formula, I found time to equal 0.714 s.

Then, I subbed this time into Formula 2 again, this time to find the initial velocity for C2:

Formula 2: 0 = 10 + v(i)(0.714) + (1/2)(-9.81)(0.714)^2
I then found the velocity to be -9.1 m/s.

So is that final answer of -9.1 m/s correct?

Thank you very much to whoever replies!
 


unigal13 said:
Would it work if I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m (I got -7.0 m/s, like I showed above), then found the time it took C1 to fall from 7.5 m to 0 m, using Formula 2:

You do not have to explicitly find the speed of C1 after it has fallen 2.5m. You just need to find the time C1 takes to fall 7.5m, as I have pointed out. Nevertheless, your method is OK. I have not checked the calculations.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top