Solve for Length of Friction-Ridden Ice Patch | Work-Energy Theorem Hint

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingsean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work-energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem using the work-energy theorem to determine the length of a friction-ridden ice patch. A skater initially moving at 3.0 m/s experiences a 45% speed reduction due to a friction force that is 25% of her weight. Participants suggest using the kinetic energy equation and incorporating the work done by friction to find the solution, emphasizing that mass (m) will cancel out. One user calculated the length to be 1.46 meters but expressed uncertainty about the final velocity calculation. The correct answer, according to the book, is 1.5 meters, indicating a need for clarity in the approach to the problem.
kingsean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been working on a problem and I'm stumped :| I'm usually pretty good at deriving the equations for problems and solving them once I find out what I need to be solved. But this one is a bit too ambiguous for me, and I'm looking for a few hints :) Anything is appreciated!

On an essentially friction-less, horizontal ice rink, a skater moving at 3.0m/s encounters a rough patch that reduces her speed by 45% due to a friction force that is 25% of her weight. Use the work-energy theorem to find the length of this rough patch.


I've tried a few methods but, alas, no answer. The back of the book says 1.5m if that is of any assistance.

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just solve the problem using "m" for the mass and it should cancel out in the end.

You know the initial energy will just be the kinetic energy (K) and that will equal the final kinetic energy plus work done by friction ( K+W_f )
 
dav2008 said:
Just solve the problem using "m" for the mass and it should cancel out in the end.

You know the initial energy will just be the kinetic energy (K) and that will equal the final kinetic energy plus work done by friction ( K+W_f )


I've taken this into consideration, but my answers still end up being too high or too low :(
 
I worked it out and got 1.46 meters as the answer.

I said that the final velocity was 3*.45 (although the wording would suggest that it should be 3-(3+.45) but that gives me 1.28)

Can you show how you're doing it and what answer you get?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top