Solve Gaussian Integral Homework: Even/Odd Cases

csnsc14320
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Solve:

In = \int_{0}^{\infty} x^n e^{-\lambda x^2} dx


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So my teacher gave a few hints regarding this. She first said to evaluate when n = 0, then consider the cases when n = even and n = odd, comparing the even cases to the p-th derivative of Io.

For the Io case, I evaluated it and obtained I_o = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\lambda}}

Now, for the "p-th" derivative of Io, i got

\frac{d^p}{d \lambda^2} I_o = \frac{\prod_{p=1}^p (1 - 2p)}{2^{p+1}} \sqrt{\pi} \lambda^{-\frac{(2p + 1)}{2}}

I don't see how this related to n = 2p (even case) where

I2p = \int_0^\infty x^{2p} e^{- \lambda x^2} dx

And even when I do figure this out, does this all combine into one answer, or is it kind of like a piecewise answer?

Any help with what to do with the even/odd cases would be greatly appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what you are asking?

\frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda} I_0 = \frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda x^2} dx = \int_{0}^{\infty} -x^2 e^{-\lambda x^2} dx = -I_2

You can apply this recursively p times to get (-1)^p I_{2p}
 
nickjer said:
Is this what you are asking?

\frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda} I_0 = \frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda x^2} dx = \int_{0}^{\infty} -x^2 e^{-\lambda x^2} dx = -I_2

You can apply this recursively p times to get (-1)^p I_{2p}

Oh yeah I see the pattern if you take the derivative of Io in integral form instead of what it actually is.

I also did it for the odds and got nice cases for both :D

thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top