Solve Gauss's Law: Electric Flux Through Sphere from Line Charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter sisigsarap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric flux through a sphere caused by an infinitely long line charge located at a distance d from the sphere's center. The user initially attempts to derive the flux using the electric field but is corrected on the approach, emphasizing that the total flux equals the enclosed charge divided by the permittivity of free space. The correct formula for the flux is identified as involving the length of the line charge that intersects the sphere, which can be determined using geometry. A user suggests visualizing the problem with a diagram and applying the Pythagorean theorem to clarify the relationship between the radius of the sphere and the distance from the line charge. The discussion concludes with acknowledgment of the helpful guidance received, leading to a better understanding of the problem.
sisigsarap
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
An infinitely long line charge having a uniform charge per unit length (half-life - if anyone could tell me the correct name for that symbol it would be great too :)) lies a distance d from the point O, where the point O is the center of a sphere. Determine the total electric flux through the surface of the sphere of radius R centered at O resulting from this line charge. Consider the case where R > d.

So my take on this is, if R is larger than d, then the infinitely long line will strike through the sphere.

I set this up as electric flux(f) = EA = Charge in sphere(q)/permittivity of free space(e)

so f = EA = q/e
The area of the sphere is 4(pi)r^2
q = (halflife)(length)

So f = E4(pi)r^2 = (halflife)(length)/e

so E = (halflife)(length)/e4(pi)r^2

I know the correct answer is ((2halflife)/e)(square root of (R^2 - d^2)

If anyone can help me out it would be greatly appreciated, I think I am on the right track, but I just cannot figure out how to go from the answer I have to the answer in the back of the book. I appreciate anyones help who takes the time to read this!

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, E isn't perpendicular to the sphere at all points, so you can't pull it outside the surface integral. But in any case, you're doing this the hard way. You don't need to know the electric field at all. You said it yourself: the total flux through the sphere is equal to the charge enclosed over e. And that half life symbol is called lambda.
 
Ok so I have Flux = (lambda * length)/permittivity of free space(e)

when I set (lambda * length)/e = (2 * lambda/e) * (square root of R^2 - d^2)

I get length = 2 * (square root of R^2 - d^2)

I am having an awefully difficult time seeing the relationship between these two.

I know that is the length of the line charge cutting through the sphere, but I am lost.

I know its something easy and I am just not seeing it!
 
It's just geometry. How much of a line that d away from the center of a sphere of radius R is inside the sphere? Draw a picture and it should be clear. Use the pythagorean theorem with one of the legs going from the center of the sphere to the midpoint of the line, and one from the midpoint of line to the surface of the sphere, where the line cuts through it. What do you know about the length of the hypotenuse of this triangle?
 
I don't know why I didnt see that right off, I must be working too hard :P

I wasnt seeing R as the hypotenuse for some reason. I feel like a dummy for making that second post now heh

Thank you StatusX you have been a great help !
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top