Solve Improper Integral: \int_{0}^{\infty} (x-1)e^{-x}dx

RyanSchw
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Improper Integral [Solved]

Homework Statement



<br /> \int_{0}^{\infty} (x-1)e^{-x}dx<br />

Homework Equations



Integration by Parts
Improper Integrals


The Attempt at a Solution



<br /> \lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_0^R~xe^{-x}-e^{-x}dx<br />

Let u = x
du = dx

Let dv = e^-x
v = -e^-x

<br /> -xe^{-x} - \int -e^{-x}dx<br />

<br /> -xe^{-x}-e^{-x} - \int e^{-x}dx<br />

<br /> = -xe^{-x}<br />

<br /> \lim_{R\rightarrow \infty}-xe^{-x} \mid_{0}^{R}=0<br />

Now there is clearly area when I look at the graph, but the graph intersects the x-axis at x=1 not x=0 I’m wondering if this is some sort of trick with the bounds of integration that I don’t see or if I made a mistake with my integration.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No integration mistake. But remember that the 'area' an integral measures is area above the x-axis minus area below the x-axis. In your case these areas are equal.
 
Thanks.

I guess since the area wasn’t symmetrical I just assumed it could not be zero, and that I had made a mistake.
 
RyanSchw said:
Thanks.

I guess since the area wasn’t symmetrical I just assumed it could not be zero, and that I had made a mistake.

When you graph xe^{-x}-e^{-x} , it does seem remarkable that that little sliver above the x-axis from x = 1 out to infinity is actually going to cancel out that curved wedge between x = 0 and x = 1. But you can satisfy yourself that you've made no mistake in your integration by evaluating the areas from x = 0 to x=1 and from x = 1 to x -> infinity separately. The areas are -1/e and +1/e , so you're OK...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top