Solve Initial Value Problem: dy/dx = x-4-xy-4y, y(0)=4 | Step-by-Step Guide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the initial value problem dy/dx = x - 4 - xy - 4y with the initial condition y(0) = 4. The initial attempt at factoring the equation was incorrect, leading to confusion in the integration process. After clarifying the equation to dy/dx = x - 4 + xy - 4y, the correct approach was confirmed, and the integration constant was addressed. A typographical error in the final solution was identified, emphasizing the importance of careful notation. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving differential equations and the need for accuracy in mathematical expressions.
p53ud0 dr34m5
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
\frac{dy}{dx}=x-4-xy-4y
you are given that y(0)=4.

so, here's what i did:
\frac{dy}{dx}=(x-4)(y+1)

\frac{dy}{y+1}=(x-4)dx

i integrated both sides:
ln(y+1)=\frac{x^2}{2}-4x+C

y=e^{\frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-4x}e^{C}-1

plugged in for x and y:
4=e^{\frac{0^2}{x}}e^{-4*0}e^{C}-1

5=e^C

so:
y=5e^{\frac{x^2}{x}}e^{-4x}

i know that's wrong, and i need help working it out. that's what i have so far though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial formula (when u restrained into a product of quantities in round brackets) is incorrect.

You may want to check again.

Daniel.
 
In other words, you factored wrong

x- 4- xy- 4y is not (x- 4)(y+1)= x- 4+ xy- 4y.
 
The bad news that the solution to this Cauchy problem,according to my version of Maple,is not pretty,not pretty at all...

Are u sure this is the equation u were supposed to solve...?

Daniel.
 
nah, i didnt factor wrong. i just wrote down the equation wrong.
\frac{dy}{dx}=x-4+xy-4y

try that one?
 
It's something else.In this case,your initial factoring turns out to be correct (in this case!) and so the solution is obtained the way you did.Unfortunately,after computing that integration constant,when writing the final solution,you made a mistake.Can u "fix" it...?

Daniel.
 
y=5e^{\frac{x^2}{x}}e^{-4x}-1
maybe? haha, I am fairly tired and at work. I am missing a lot of things. :frown:
 
It's a typo (again!),it's not "x",but "2" in the denominator of the exponential...But the rest is FINALLY correct.

Advice:take a well diserved break...:wink:

Daniel.
 
oh my dear! i can't believe i missed that! i still must be fried from the weed. :smile:
 
Back
Top