Solve Inverse Fifth Law Homework: Sign of A and Radii of Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter the keck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the homework problem involving a charged particle in a circular orbit with a potential energy defined as U(r) = -A/r^4. The key conclusion is that A must be positive to maintain consistency with the centripetal force and potential energy relationship. The participants clarify the interpretation of signs in the equations, emphasizing that the negative force indicates directionality towards the center of the orbit. The correct interpretation leads to the conclusion that the radius squared, derived from the equations, must be positive for valid physical solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically circular motion.
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions and their derivatives.
  • Knowledge of Bohr's quantization of angular momentum.
  • Basic proficiency in vector calculus and polar coordinates.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of potential energy functions in classical mechanics.
  • Learn about Bohr's model and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the derivation and significance of centripetal force in circular motion.
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of forces in polar coordinates.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to potential energy and circular motion.

the keck
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charged particle of mass m moves non-relativistically around a circular orbit. The potential energy is U(r)= -A/r^4.

What is the sign of A and why?
Using Bohr's quantization for angular momentum to calculate the allowed values of the radius.


Homework Equations



F=-dV/dx
F=mv^2/r
mvr=nh/2*Pi


The Attempt at a Solution



Intuitively, I thought that A is positive, cause classically you consider that at infinity, the potential is zero. However, when I determined the radius of orbits, it turns out that r^2 is negative, and you cannot square root it!

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

Sub it v=nh/2*PI*m*r

and r^2 = -4*m*A/n^2*H^2 where H=h/2*PI

Could I ignore the negative sign here?

Thanks

Regards,
The Keck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

This seems some standard homework or exercise.
In your first equation:

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

You have a mistake in the sign of the right hand side when differentiating.


Best regards
 
No, I'm pretty sure I didn't make a mistake.

dV/dx= (-4 x -A)/r^5 = (4xA)/(r^5)

-dV/dx = F(x) = -4A/(r^5)

Regards,
The Keck
 
The signs are just fine. The problem is how to interpret them. The acceleration v^2/r is always pointed toward the center. When you are talking about the force of the potential, the positive r direction is usually outward toward larger r. So the negative sign on the force just means that it's directed inward also. The are both pointed in the same direction (for A positive). Just drop the superfluous sign.
 
Thanks, I understand what you mean now, it's just I didn't really think about it using that reasoning

Regards,
The Keck
 
Sorry, i did not expain very detail. I mean that:

\vec{F}=-\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}U(r)=\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})

The acceleration in 2-D polar coordinate
\vec{a}=(\ddot{r}-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r}+(r\ddot{\theta}+2\dot{r}\omega)\hat{\theta}
The central acceleration in the case is \vec{a}=(-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r} only, where \dot{\theta} = \text{angular speed respect ro the origin} = \frac{v^2}{r}

Therefore,
\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})=m(-\frac{v^2}{r})\hat{r}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\frac{4A}{r^5}=m\frac{v^2}{r}

However, Dick expained very well already.



Best regards
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
765
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K