Solve Inverse Fifth Law Homework: Sign of A and Radii of Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter the keck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving a charged particle in a circular orbit with a potential energy of U(r) = -A/r^4. Participants debate the sign of A, concluding that A must be positive, as potential energy approaches zero at infinity. The calculations for the radius of orbits reveal an issue with negative values, prompting a review of the force equations and their signs. Clarifications are made regarding the interpretation of forces and accelerations in polar coordinates, emphasizing that the negative sign indicates direction rather than an error in the calculations. Ultimately, the participants agree on the correct interpretation of the equations and the implications for the problem.
the keck
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charged particle of mass m moves non-relativistically around a circular orbit. The potential energy is U(r)= -A/r^4.

What is the sign of A and why?
Using Bohr's quantization for angular momentum to calculate the allowed values of the radius.


Homework Equations



F=-dV/dx
F=mv^2/r
mvr=nh/2*Pi


The Attempt at a Solution



Intuitively, I thought that A is positive, cause classically you consider that at infinity, the potential is zero. However, when I determined the radius of orbits, it turns out that r^2 is negative, and you cannot square root it!

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

Sub it v=nh/2*PI*m*r

and r^2 = -4*m*A/n^2*H^2 where H=h/2*PI

Could I ignore the negative sign here?

Thanks

Regards,
The Keck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

This seems some standard homework or exercise.
In your first equation:

mv^2/r=-4*A/r^5 (Centripetal force to -dV/dx)

You have a mistake in the sign of the right hand side when differentiating.


Best regards
 
No, I'm pretty sure I didn't make a mistake.

dV/dx= (-4 x -A)/r^5 = (4xA)/(r^5)

-dV/dx = F(x) = -4A/(r^5)

Regards,
The Keck
 
The signs are just fine. The problem is how to interpret them. The acceleration v^2/r is always pointed toward the center. When you are talking about the force of the potential, the positive r direction is usually outward toward larger r. So the negative sign on the force just means that it's directed inward also. The are both pointed in the same direction (for A positive). Just drop the superfluous sign.
 
Thanks, I understand what you mean now, it's just I didn't really think about it using that reasoning

Regards,
The Keck
 
Sorry, i did not expain very detail. I mean that:

\vec{F}=-\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}U(r)=\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})

The acceleration in 2-D polar coordinate
\vec{a}=(\ddot{r}-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r}+(r\ddot{\theta}+2\dot{r}\omega)\hat{\theta}
The central acceleration in the case is \vec{a}=(-\dot{\theta}^2r)\hat{r} only, where \dot{\theta} = \text{angular speed respect ro the origin} = \frac{v^2}{r}

Therefore,
\frac{4A}{r^5}(-\hat{r})=m(-\frac{v^2}{r})\hat{r}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\frac{4A}{r^5}=m\frac{v^2}{r}

However, Dick expained very well already.



Best regards
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top