Solve Large Numerical Values Without a Calculator

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PageWizard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator Numerical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating large numerical values, specifically powers of 2, without a calculator. The primary method discussed involves using logarithms, specifically approximating log(2) as 0.3 to estimate values like 2^2007 as approximately 10^602. Additionally, the conversation touches on modular arithmetic to determine the last digit of powers of 2, highlighting the repeating pattern in the last digits of powers of 2 modulo 10. These techniques provide efficient ways to handle large exponentiation problems in mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithms, particularly log base 10 and natural logarithms.
  • Familiarity with the properties of exponents and powers.
  • Basic knowledge of modular arithmetic and its applications.
  • Concept of approximation in mathematical calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithms, focusing on common logarithms and their applications in estimation.
  • Learn about modular arithmetic, specifically how to find patterns in powers of integers modulo n.
  • Explore numerical approximation techniques, including the use of Taylor series for estimating powers.
  • Investigate the relationship between binary and decimal systems, particularly in the context of large numbers.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in number theory, educators teaching exponentiation and logarithms, and anyone interested in efficient calculation methods for large numbers.

PageWizard
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone :),

I'm sure someone will have no problem helping me with this. How do I figure out large powered numerical values without using a calculator. Kept getting questions involving 2^2007 and others. How would I be able to figure out these values without using a calculator or a lot of time on my hands? I haven't studied yet how to figure this out. Hope that makes sense, and thank you for your time to helping me with this :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not certain I understand just what you want. It seems pretty pointless to be able to write out all the digits in the number 2^2007. So how about an approximate result where you find the nearest power of 10?

Basically, you need to know that log(2) is approximately 0.3. Using that, we can write:

<br /> 2^{2007} = 10^{\log(2^{2007})}<br /> = 10^{2007 \cdot log(2)}<br /> \approx 10^{2007 \ \cdot \ 0.3}<br /> \approx 10^{602}<br />

Or ... you can use the fact (familiar to those knowledgeable about computers) that 2^10 is approximately 1000 or 10^3 (It's really 1024, but we're approximating here). So:

<br /> 2^{2007} = 2^{10 \ \cdot \ 200.7} = (2^{10})^{200.7} \approx (10^3)^{200.7} = 10^{3 \ \cdot \ 200.7} \approx 10^{602}<br />
 
Or...

the questions may have been about modular arithmetic, like "what is the last digit of 2^2007". In that case, you look at

2^1 = 2 (mod 10)
2^2 = 4 (mod 10)
2^3 = 8 (mod 10)
2^4 = 6 (mod 10)
2^5 = 2 (mod 10)
. . .

and notice that the pattern repeats.
 
I think they would be looking for modular arithmetic since this is a number theory style proof they request for these type of questions. But, this helps me out thank you, gives me somewhere to start :).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
829
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K