Solve Mcos^2(x) + Ncos(x) – 3 = 0 for M & N | Trig Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathhelp77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation Mcos^2(x) + Ncos(x) – 3 = 0 for M and N, the given solutions cos(x) = -3/4 and cos(x) = 1/2 can be used to derive the quadratic equation. By treating cos(x) as a variable, one can find the quadratic that corresponds to these solutions. The process involves equating the coefficients of the derived quadratic with those in the original equation. This approach simplifies the problem, eliminating the need for trigonometric identities. The discussion emphasizes that the problem is more algebraic than trigonometric.
Mathhelp77
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If cos(x) = -¾ or cos = ½ then the value of M and N in the equation Mcos^2(x) + Ncos(x) – 3 = 0 are what?


Homework Equations


Identities I can use:
csc(x) = 1/sin(x)
cot(x) = 1/tan(x)
sec(x) = 1/cos(x)
tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
cot(x) = cos(x)/sin(x)
sin^2(x) +cos^2(x) = 1
1 +tan^2(x) = sec^2(x)
1 +cot^2(x) = csc^2(x)
sin(A+B) = (sinA)(cosB) + (cosA)(sinB)
sin(A-B) = (sinA)(cosB) - (cosA)(sinB)
cos(A+B) = (cosA)(cosB) - (sinA)(sinB)
cos(A-B) = (cosA)(cosB) + (sinA)(sinB)
sin(2A) = 2(sinA)(cosA)
cos(2A) = cos^2A - sin^2A



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathhelp77 said:
cos = ½

What is that? Welcome to PF. You need to attempt a solution before we can really help.
 
Alright :) I have kind of a few different things I've been working on and I'm not sure which is right or if any of them are...

I considered using the pythagorean identity to get
-Msin^2(x) + Ncos(x) - 2 = 0

and that is my best guess but that doesn't really make sense cause then I am bringing sin which might make it more difficult :S So... perhaps I have to see what it could factor into?
 
This is not really a trig question, but more of an algebra question. I assume you know how to solve quadratics by factoring. Here's an example:

\begin{aligned}<br /> 3y^2 - y - 4 &amp;= 0 \\<br /> (3y - 4)(y + 1) &amp;= 0 \\<br /> 3y - 4 &amp;= 0 \rightarrow y = 4/3 \\<br /> y + 1 &amp;= 0 \rightarrow y = -1<br /> \end{aligned}

But suppose I gave you the solutions y = 4/3 and y = -1 and I want you to find the quadratic with those solutions. We go "backwards":
\begin{aligned}<br /> y = 4/3 \rightarrow 3y = 4 \rightarrow 3y - 4 &amp;= 0 \\<br /> y = -1 \rightarrow y + 1 &amp;= 0 \\<br /> (3y - 4)(y + 1) &amp;= 0 \\<br /> 3y^2 - y - 4 &amp;= 0<br /> \end{aligned}

You have to do something similar here. You're given the "solutions":
cos x = -3/4 and cos x = 1/2.
Pretend that "cos x" is the variable. Go "backwards" and find the quadratic in terms of cos x. Equate the coefficients with
M\cos^2 x + N\cos x - 3 = 0
to find M and N. That's it! No identities needed.
 
okay that makes sense! Thanks a lot you were a huge help!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top