Solve Orbital Period for Two Identical Planets Around Star

  • Thread starter Thread starter char808
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the orbital period T for two identical planets orbiting a star while positioned diametrically opposite each other. Participants debate whether the gravitational interaction between the planets affects their motion, concluding that it does influence the acceleration of each planet. The relevant equations for orbital motion, including T^2=(4pi^2/GM)r^3 and the gravitational force equations, are referenced. The center of rotation is identified as the star's center, simplifying the analysis. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both the star's and the planets' gravitational forces in solving for T.
char808
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two identical planets (equal masses, m) move in identical circular orbits around a star (mass M) diametrically opposed to each other (opposite sides of the planet). Find an expression in terms of m, r, M and G for the orbital period T.





Homework Equations



T^2=(4pi^2/GM)r^3

F=Gm1m2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution




I haven't really gotten to far on this because I can't decide if the planets are affecting each other. It would seem that they are because all mass exerts a gravitation force on other mass. But they are not orbiting around each other...So the force between the two is irrelevant to the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
char808 said:

Homework Statement



Two identical planets (equal masses, m) move in identical circular orbits around a star (mass M) diametrically opposed to each other (opposite sides of the planet). Find an expression in terms of m, r, M and G for the orbital period T.





Homework Equations



T^2=(4pi^2/GM)r^3

F=Gm1m2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution




I haven't really gotten to far on this because I can't decide if the planets are affecting each other. It would seem that they are because all mass exerts a gravitation force on other mass. But they are not orbiting around each other...So the force between the two is irrelevant to the problem?

The force between the two is very relevant. The acceleration of each of the two planets is determined by the combined forces of the star and the other planet.
 
Ok, do you have a resource on how to look at these problems? My book only covers 1 satellite around a planet.



∑Fm=GMm/r^2 +Gmm/(2r)2

So can I say:?

mam= GMm/r2+Gmm/(2r)2 = mv2/r

and T=2∏r/v
 
Last edited:
char808 said:
Ok, do you have a resource on how to look at these problems? My book only covers 1 satellite around a planet.



∑Fm=GMm/r^2 +Gmm/(2r)2

So can I say:?

mam= GMm/r2+Gmm/(2r)2 = mv2/r

and T=2∏r/v

Good! Now all you have to do is solve for v and put that into your formula for T.
 
char808 said:
Ok, do you have a resource on how to look at these problems? My book only covers 1 satellite around a planet.
It is easier to do if you have two identical planets on opposite sides of the star like this.

The centre of rotation is always the center of mass of the system. In a one-planet system, this depends on the relative masses. In this case, you know that the centre of rotation is the centre of star regardless of the value of m.

AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top