Solve Physics Problem: Wave Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to a particle's wave function. Participants focus on normalizing the wave function, determining the associated frequency, and finding the potential energy function that satisfies the Schrödinger equation. There is clarification on terminology, specifically the distinction between "differentiate" and "derive." The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper mathematical expressions and corrections in the context of quantum mechanics. Overall, the thread highlights collaborative problem-solving in physics.
mlee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hey who can help me with this physics problem?

A particle of mass m is in the state:
Ψ (x, t) = Aexp[-a(sqrt (mx^2) / h)-i (at / sqrt(m )) ]
where A and a are positive real constants.
a) Determine A.
b) What is the frequency ƒ associated with the wave function of this particle?
Explain your reasoning.
c) For what potential energy function U(x), does Ψ satisfy the Schrödinger
equation?
d) If we use the interpretation of [Ψ(x)]^2 dx as the probability that a particle of
mass m can be found in a region of width dx around the position x,
calculate the expected value (average value) of the position x.


Many thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A. Normalize it.
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx =1
B. Please don't make me do that. I have my own. It's probably just hard work.
C. Differentiate it and place it in Shroedinger's equation. You'll get the potential.
D. By definition:
<x>=\int \psi^*(x) x \psi(x)\,dx
 
Last edited:
Palindrom said:
C. Derive it and place it in Shroedinger's equation. You'll get the potential.

By "derive", you mean "differentiate" or "take the derivative", right? Those things don't mean the same as "derive".
 
Nylex said:
By "derive", you mean "differentiate" or "take the derivative", right? Those things don't mean the same as "derive".
That's what I meant. You'll have to forgive me, I'm not used to saying it in English.
 
Palindrom said:
A. Normalize it.
\int_{a}^{b} \psi dx =1
For a and b being - and + infinity.
B. Please don't make me do that. I have my own. It's probably just hard work.
C. Differentiate it and place it in Shroedinger's equation. You'll get the potential.
D. By definition:
<x>=\int \psi^*(x) x \psi(x)\,dx

1.Your edited your post and now it's "differentiate".
2.The first formula is incorrect;it has something missing:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx =1
The rest is correct and i agree with you.
 
dextercioby said:
1.Your edited your post and now it's "differentiate".
2.The first formula is incorrect;it has something missing:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx =1
The rest is correct and i agree with you.
Thanks for the correction, I edited.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top