Solve Pulley System: Find Acceleration of m3, B, m1, m2 & Tension in A & C

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a pulley system problem involving three masses and two pulleys. Participants are trying to find the acceleration of the blocks and the tensions in the strings. A key point is that the two masses cannot be treated as a single mass, and the relationship between the tensions in the strings is clarified, with T3 equating to twice T due to the massless nature of the pulleys. The acceleration relationships between the masses are also emphasized, leading to the conclusion that a1 + a2 = 2a3. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for correctly applying Newton's laws to solve the problem.
awelex
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See picture: http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1038667/6/YF-05-85.jpg

All pulleys are weight- and frictionless, as are the ropes.

Find the acceleration of block m3, of pulley B, of block m1 and m2, the tension in String A, and the tension in string C.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


To find the acceleration of m3, I thought of m1 and m2 as a single mass, which should turn the problem into a simple Atwood problem. The two equations that I got out of this are:

(m1+m2)g - T2 = (m1+m2)*a
T2 - m3*g = m3*a

Solving for a yields g*(m1 + m2 - m3)/(m1 + m2 + 2m3), which is not even close to the solution.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your logic won't lead you to the answer. You cannot think 2 masses as a single mass.
Hint: Use Constrained relations
 
Hi Abdul,
thanks for your answer. I know that it is somehow possible to express one tension in terms of the other (and I remember reading somewhere that one is twice the other), but I don't understand at all how to do that.
If pulley B was in equilibrium, then it would make sense: the tension in C must equal twice the tension at point A. But since the system is not in equilibrium, my reasoning is wrong, isn't it?
 
Whether the system is in equilibrium or not, from Newton's third law T1+T2 = T3,
where T1 and T2 are the tensions in the string connecting m1 and m2 respectively and T3 is the tension at C.
Since it is mentioned in the problem that pulleys and ropes are massless, T2=T1=T and as you said, the tension in C must equal twice the tension at point A (T3=2T).

If you are smart, you can use simple logic to get the relation between accelerations of different masses (instead of working on time taking constrained relationships).

Assuming you are :wink:,
Consider this- if m1 moves down with a1= 1m/s^2
and m2 moves up with a2= 1m/s^2, accleration of m3, a3=0

if m1 moves down with a1=1m/s^2
and m2 moves down with a2=1m/s^2, a3=1m/s^2 UPWARDS

It easily follows that a1 + a2=2a3

Now use Newton's second law for each mass, get 3 equations, solve them with the equation above, you will get your answer :smile:
 
Hi Abdul,

thanks again. It's all making sense now, except that I still can't figure out why T3 = 2T.

Again, in my earlier example I assumed that pulley B was in equilibrium. In that case, the net force must be zero, so

Fnet = 2T - T3 = 0

In that case, it is evident that T3 = 2T. But the system is obviously not in equilibrium, so instead we have

Fnet = 2T - T3 = aB*mB

How can you deduce from this that T3 = 2T? Is it because mB = 0?
 
awelex said:
How can you deduce from this that T3 = 2T? Is it because mB = 0?

Yes.
Consider the motion of the pulley B,
The forces on this light pulley are
1) T3 upwards by the upper string
b) 2T downwards by the lower string

As the mass of the pulley is negligible
2T-T3=0
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top