Solve Solid State Physics Questions: KC1, NAC1, X Rays

fabsuk
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
1 few questions here

Does anyone know websites that i can get solid state physics problems and answers.

2ndly How do you show a semiconductor of type 1
behaves as a perfect diamagnet.

I know by drawing a diagram but don't how to show it

3rdly

what is the definition of an 'optical branch' and 'acoustic branch' for chain of atoms. I can't find
clear definitions

4thly

explain why kc1 which has the nac1 structure scatters X rays as though it had the simple cubic structure with half the true lattice spacing

All these questions are bothering and can't find them in books.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The optical and acoustic branches come about because the lattice has a basis, i.e. two different atomic species. The acoustic branch is due to the atoms oscillating in phase with each other. The optical branch is seen when the atoms of different masses oscillate out of phase with each other.

Your text should have these answers in there.
 
fabsuk said:
All these questions are bothering and can't find them in books.
Get a copy of Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics. (Some people prefer older editions).
As for question 2, that should be a superconductor not a semiconductor. There is a huge difference!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top