Solve Surface Integral: \vec{F}\cdot\vec{n}\, dS

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Evaluate the surface integral \vec{F}\cdot\vec{n}\, dS

where \vec{F}=<-y,x,0> and S is the part of the plane z=8x-4y-5 that lies below the triangle with vertices at (0,0,0,), (0,1,0,) and (1,0,0). The orientation of S is given by the upward normal vector. answer: 2


I am not sure if I am just making a careless mistake or a conceptual one.

The Attempt at a Solution



i.) Parametrizing S gives \vec{r}(x,y)=<x, y, 8x-4y-5>

ii.) Finding \frac{\partial r}{\partial x}\times \frac{\partial r}{\partial y}=<1,0,8>\times<0,1,-4>=-8,4,1

iii.) Thus, \vec{F}(\vec{r}(x,y))\cdot (\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}\times \frac{\partial r}{\partial y})=<-y,x,0>\cdot<-8,4,1>=<4x+8y>

iv) Therefore I=\int\int_D (4x+8y)\, dA

=\int_{x=0}^1 \int_{y=0}^x (4x+8y)\,dy\, dx

I believe that if I made an error, it was made somewhere in here and not in my integration.

Any major blunders here?

Thanks,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at your integral limits. You are integrating over the triangle formed by (0,0,0), (0,1,0) and (1,1,0).
 
Dick said:
Look at your integral limits. You are integrating over the triangle formed by (0,0,0), (0,1,0) and (1,1,0).

Not sure I follow. My x bounds are correct right?
 
Is my upper y bound supposed to be (1-x)?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Is my upper y bound supposed to be (1-x)?

It sure is!
 
:redface: That's what I get for thinking I can do everything in my head...Teehee...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top