Solve Tension in Three Blocks of Mass: m1, m2, m3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Northstar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tensions T1 and T3 in a system of three blocks connected by strings over pulleys. The user initially struggles with applying the net force equation correctly, specifically in determining the forces acting on block m1 and m3. After receiving advice to create a Free Body Diagram, the user realizes the mistake in their calculations for T1, correcting the equation to T = m(g + a). This adjustment leads to the correct determination of T1 and T3, with T3 calculated as 8(9.81 - 2.31). The thread highlights the importance of accurately setting up equations and visualizing forces in physics problems.
Northstar
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a couple questions that I can't figure out regarding the following question. The picture pertains to the question.

http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8229/physnd4.jpg

Three blocks of mass m1 = 4 kg, m2 = 5 kg and m3 = 8 kg are connected by strings which pass over two ideal pulleys as shown in the figure below.

What is T1, the magnitude of the tension in the string that is connected to the block of mass m1?

and

What is T3, the magnitude of the tension in the string that is connected to the block of mass m3?

I found acceleration to be 2.31m/s^2 (and it was correct). I know Fnet = ma, but for whatever reason I am setting something up wrong for Fnet. I thought Fnet would be the force of gravity acting on the block + the force being pulled up (in the case of m1) or the block going downward (as in m3).

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try making a Free Body Diagram for the block in the middle. That will really help.
 
Ok, I figured it out, thanks. Basically for T1 what I was doing wrong in the equation T = m (g-a) was taking 9.81-2.31 instead of adding them together. Then I was able to figure out that T3 was 8 (9.81-2.31).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top