Solve the Relativity Paradox: Two Objects Moving at Light Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter jujufactory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Relativity
jujufactory
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could somebody please clear up this paradox for me.

Two objects, A and B, are moving past each other at close to the speed of light relative to each other.

So far so good.

Object A looks at object B and sees object B fly by at close to the speed of light. Object A figures time dilatation takes effect and concludes the clocks on B are moving more slowly than on A.

Object B looks at object A and concludes the same thing.

A while later, the two objects meet up with each other and compare clocks. Are their clocks indicating the same time or different times? Which clock is ahead? If none of the clocks are ahead, then what happened to relativity?

This ongoing paradox seems to undermine the entire theory. Could somebody clear up this paradox. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no paradox, whilst it is counterintutive that both should see each other's clocks running slower than their own, it's not inconsistant.

When they meet up for a second time their clocks can show either the same or different amount of times elapsed. This depends on how they meet up (i.e. the details of the accelartion, path, etc). Generally speaking if they maintain symmetry between each other they will show the same amount of time elapsed, if they break the symmetry then they will show a different amount of time elapsed.
 
The Twin Paradox

jujufactory said:
A while later, the two objects meet up with each other and compare clocks.
In order for the two "objects" to meet up and compare clocks, at least one of them must accelerate. That breaks the symmetry.

This situation is usually called the "Twin Paradox" and has been discussed here many times in numerous threads. Rather than start yet another thread on this same old thing, I recommend that you search the archives. Also read this: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top