Solving 1D/2D Eigenvalue Equation for Proving Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonny81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalue
jonny81
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I want to prove that the function \mathcal{A} in the 1D case satisfy

\mathcal{A}=\frac{48}{m}\sum_{j=1}^\infty \frac{\sin^2(qj/2)}{j^5}=\frac{12}{m}\left[2\zeta(5)-\text{Li}_5(e^{iq})-\text{Li}_5(e^{-iq})\right],

with \text{Li}_n(z) the polylogarithm function, and the matrix \mathcal{A} in the 2D case satisfy

\mathcal{A}=\frac{3}{m}\sum_{j\neq 0}\left[1-\frac{5}{|\vec{r}_j^0|^2}\begin{pmatrix}(x_j^0)^2&x_jy_j\\x_jy_j&(y_j^0)^2\end{pmatrix}\right]\frac{\left(1-e^{i\vec{q}\vec{r}_j^0}\right)}{|\vec{r}_j^0|^5}

Can somebody help me, please, to do this? In 2D the equilibrium positions \vec{r}_i^0 form a triangular lattice with basic lattice vectors a_1 = (1, 0) and a_2 = (1,\sqrt{3})/2.

Starting point:

m\vec{\ddot x}_i=\frac{3}{2}\sum_{i\neq j}^{N}\left[\frac{5(\vec{r}_i^0 - \vec{r}_j^0)^2\left(\vec{x}_j-\vec{x}_i\right)}{|\vec{r}_i^0 - \vec{r}_j^0|^7}+\frac{\left(\vec{x}_i-\vec{x}_j\right)}{|\vec{r}_i^0 - \vec{r}_j^0|^5}\right]

with the ansatz

\vec{x}_i(t)=\epsilon_\lambda(\vec{q})e^{i\left(\vec{q}\vec{r}_i^0-\omega_\lambda(\vec{q})t\right)}
\vec{\ddot x}_i(t)=-\omega^2\epsilon_\lambda(\vec{q})e^{i\left(\vec{q}\vec{r}_i^0-\omega_\lambda(\vec{q})t\right)}

follows

-\omega^2_\lambda(\vec{q})\epsilon_\lambda(\vec{q})=\mathcal{A}\epsilon_\lambda(\vec{q})

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
new to PF?
what have you tried? is this a condense matter problem?
 
mjsd said:
new to PF?

Yes!

mjsd said:
what have you tried?

with the ansatz in the equation of motion, i obtain

\mathcal{A}=\frac{3}{2m}\sum_{i\neq j}\left[1-\frac{5}{|\vec{r}_i^0-\vec{r}_j^0|^2}\left(\vec{r}_i^0-\vec{r}_j^0\right)^2 \right]\frac{\left(1-e^{i\vec{q}(\vec{r}_i^0-\vec{r}_j^0)}\right)}{|\vec{r}_i^0-\vec{r}_j^0|^5}

What I have to do next? I do not make any differentiation about 1D and 2D.

mjsd said:
is this a condense matter problem?

I consider a dipolar crystal.
 
your question is asked in some kind of a strange way... I don't even know what you are asking...or what are you trying to prove? just sub in the ansatz and check? what are you having problems with? it is difficult for anyone to help without knowing what you are stuck at. Besides in this forum you are meant to show us what you have tried
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top