Solving 2 + cos2x = 3cosx: 0<x<2pi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karma
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation 2 + cos(2x) = 3cos(x) is solved for the interval 0 < x < 2π. The transformation leads to the quadratic equation 2cos²(x) - 3cos(x) + 1 = 0, which factors to (2cos(x) - 1)(cos(x) - 1) = 0. The solutions are cos(x) = 1, yielding x = 0, and cos(x) = 1/2, yielding x = π/3 and x = 5π/3. It is essential to verify these solutions by substituting them back into the original equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically cos(2x) = cos²(x) - sin²(x)
  • Familiarity with solving quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of the unit circle and cosine values
  • Ability to verify solutions in trigonometric equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply trigonometric identities in solving equations
  • Study the process of verifying solutions in algebraic equations
  • Explore the implications of variable substitution in equations
  • Investigate the properties of the cosine function over specified intervals
USEFUL FOR

Students studying trigonometry, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in solving trigonometric equations effectively.

Karma
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
The question is solve [tex]2 + cos2x=3cosx[/tex] for 0<- X <-2pi greater/equal to zero and less than or equal to 2pi.

My solution
[tex]2+cos2x=3cosx[/tex]
[tex]2+cosx^2-sin^2=3cosx[/tex]
[tex]2+cosx^2-(1-cosx^2)=3cosx[/tex]
[tex]2+2cosx^2-1-3cosx=0[/tex]
[tex]2cos^2-3cosx+1=0[/tex]

Factoring
[tex]2x^2-3x+1=0[/tex]
[tex](2x-1)(x-1)=0[/tex]
[tex]x=1 or x=1/2[/tex]

solving for cos i get
[tex]cos(x)=1 --> x=0[/tex]
[tex]cos(x)=1/2 -->x= pi/3 or 5pi/3[/tex]

Did i do this Right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about 2pi?


You have the right idea; I will complain that you used the same letter x for multiple things, though. The x in

2x2 - 3 x + 1 = 0

is not the same as the x in

2 + cos 2x = 3 cos x.

You really should introduce a new variable when you do something like that, and you ought to indicate how it relates to the old variables. e.g.

Let y = cos x. Then, 2y2 - 3 y + 1 = 0, ...



And you are missing one step (which is unfortunately missed a lot) -- now that you have some candidate solutions, you need to either plug them back into the original equation to see if they really are solutions, or you need to argue that all of your work is reversible.

If it's patently obvious you've used only reversible steps, then it's okay to skip this last one -- but otherwise you should do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K