Solving 2D Force Systems for Calculating Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
To solve the 2D force system problem, start by drawing a free body diagram to label the forces acting on the sack. Since the system is in static equilibrium, apply the equations of statics: the sum of horizontal forces (∑Fx=0) and vertical forces (∑Fy=0) must equal zero. The tension in the rope segments AB and BC must be equal, and their vertical components should total 981 N, corresponding to the weight of the sack. If initial attempts using a calculator are unsuccessful, consider simplifying the approach by focusing on side lengths and their ratios rather than complex trigonometric functions. A clear understanding of the forces and their relationships is essential for setting up the correct equations.
Oxford365
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I attached a picture of the question.
FullSizeRender (2).jpg

Homework Equations


∑Fx=0
∑Fy=0
100kg(9.8)= 981 N

I am not sure how to start this problem. Everything else in this chapter is a breeze so perhaps a small insight or how to start would be sufficient, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oxford365 said:

Homework Statement


I attached a picture of the question.
View attachment 88666

Homework Equations


∑Fx=0
∑Fy=0
100kg(9.8)= 981 N

I am not sure how to start this problem. Everything else in this chapter is a breeze so perhaps a small insight or how to start would be sufficient, thanks.
Start by drawing a free body diagram and labeling the forces acting on the sack.
 
SteamKing said:
Start by drawing a free body diagram and labeling the forces acting on the sack.
SteamKing said:
Start by drawing a free body diagram and labeling the forces acting on the sack.
 

Attachments

  • FBD.jpg
    FBD.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 457
So far so good.

You are given the total length of the rope ABC and some other dimensions to help you figure out the angles.

You also know that this system is in static equilibrium, so you should start writing the equations of statics for this system.
 
SteamKing said:
So far so good.

You are given the total length of the rope ABC and some other dimensions to help you figure out the angles.

You also know that this system is in static equilibrium, so you should start writing the equations of statics for this system.

I set these equations up and I tried solving on my ti-89 but it did not work. I think I am thinking too much into this because it should be a fairly easy question.
FullSizeRender (4).jpg

Any advice for a new plan of attack?
 
Oxford365 said:
I set these equations up and I tried solving on my ti-89 but it did not work. I think I am thinking too much into this because it should be a fairly easy question.
View attachment 88678
Any advice for a new plan of attack?
The rope provides several pieces of information.

Since the sack is in static equilibrium, you know that the sum of the horizontal components of the tensions in rope segments AB and BC must equal zero.

Since the rope is a single continuous piece, the magnitude of the tension in segments AB and BC must also be equal.

What can you say about the sum of the vertical components of the tensions in segments AB and BC?
 
SteamKing said:
The rope provides several pieces of information.

Since the sack is in static equilibrium, you know that the sum of the horizontal components of the tensions in rope segments AB and BC must equal zero.

Since the rope is a single continuous piece, the magnitude of the tension in segments AB and BC must also be equal.

What can you say about the sum of the vertical components of the tensions in segments AB and BC?

The vertical components must equal 981 correct?
 
Oxford365 said:
The vertical components must equal 981 correct?
Yes.
 
SteamKing said:
Yes.
I'm not really seeing how I need to set up system of equations based on this
 
  • #10
Oxford365 said:
I'm not really seeing how I need to set up system of equations based on this
You may have to work thru a series of different calculations. Not every problem can be wrapped up in a neat system of equations to solve at one fell swoop.
 
  • #11
Oxford365 said:
I set these equations up and I tried solving on my ti-89 but it did not work. I think I am thinking too much into this because it should be a fairly easy question.
View attachment 88678
Any advice for a new plan of attack?
You have written expressions like ##\cos(\frac x{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}})##. Think about that again.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
You have written expressions like ##\cos(\frac x{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}})##. Think about that again.
I see. I changed all of the trig functions to the inverses, but it is still not working out, I can't seem to find a simpler way to relate the info I am given and write better equations.
 
  • #13
Oxford365 said:
I see. I changed all of the trig functions to the inverses,
That would not be right either. To be invoking trig functions, or inverses thereof, there must be terms in the equation that represent angles. You have no need of such here. You can do everything in terms of side lengths and their ratios.
 
Back
Top