Solving a Circuit: Finding Voltage at Node 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter pat666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Voltage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a circuit problem involving voltage calculations at Node 3 using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). The user initially misapplied KCL, leading to incorrect voltage values of 9, 8, and 7 volts. The correct approach involves systematically applying KCL without sign errors in the equations. The user is guided to write equations based on current flowing out of the nodes, specifically for Node 1, which leads to a more accurate analysis of the circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law
  • Basic circuit analysis techniques
  • Experience with circuit simulation tools like Multisim
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Kirchhoff's Current Law applications in circuit analysis
  • Practice writing node voltage equations systematically
  • Learn about circuit simulation verification using Multisim
  • Explore common sign conventions in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in circuit analysis and troubleshooting will benefit from this discussion.

pat666
Messages
703
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been trying this Q for a week now and still can't get the answer correct. I've used a lab and multisim to know what the answer should be but my equations are wrong.

see attached for circuit


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



node 3 is 0v because its on the ground
0= (v_1-10)/4k7-v_1/10k-(v_2-v_1)/1k
0=(v_2-v_1)/1000-(v_2-v_4)/470-(v_2-v_4)/1000
0=(v_4-v_2)1k-(v_4-v_2)/470-(v_4-5)/10000-v_4/10k

That comes out to 9,8 and 7 volts respectively which is way off.

Thanks for any help.
 

Attachments

  • NA2.png
    NA2.png
    17.2 KB · Views: 447
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't done the analysis myself (I will if you would like to see it, since you've obviously made a good attempt at the question) but I believe there are sign errors in your equations.

When doing node analysis, you're applying Kirchoff's Current Law, so for each node you can write, for example:

current into node 1 from node 2 + current into node 1 from node 3 + current into node 1 from node 4 = 0

or you can do the sum of current out of the node instead, if you wish. Note that there are no minus signs in the equation above, or it no longer holds.

What you seem to have done in your first equation is:

Current out of node 1 to node 2 - current out of node 1 to node 3 - current into node 1 from node 4 = 0

Notice the inconsistency? try to be more systematic about generating your equations and you should get there.
 
Hey,
I thought that there might have been something wrong with the signs. How do I tell the directions of the current? We have been taught current out of node = 0 so that's what I'm trying to do. and I wouldn't mind seeing how you do it so that I can try and see how you assign the current directions.

Thanks for the reply
 
Sure; I'll just do the equation for node 1, then I can go into some detail. And I'll use the currents out of the node, since that's what you've learned:

by Ohm's law, the current going from node 1 to power supply 1 is:

\frac{v_1 - 10}{4 700}

note that I put v_1 first and 10V second. This makes sense, since it will be positive if v_1 is larger than 10: i.e. current will flow out of the node if the node voltage is larger than the battery voltage.

Similarily, the current from node 1 to node 3 is:

\frac{v_1 - 0}{10 000}

and from node 1 to node 2:

\frac{v_1 - v_2}{1 000}

So our equation for node 1 becomes:

\frac{v_1 - 10}{4 700} + \frac{v_1}{10 000} + \frac{v_1 - v_2}{1 000} = 0

Can you do the other two?
 
Hey I think I have it now but would you mind checking because it does differ a bit from multisim (not much) . I attached my solution.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • NA2 solution.png
    NA2 solution.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 461

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K