Solving a Closed System w/Conservative Forces: Is E1=E2 Always True?

AI Thread Summary
In a closed system with conservative forces, the energy conservation principle E1=E2 does not always apply when analyzing individual particles, particularly in a two-body problem. The potential energy, represented as -Gm1m2/r, is a property of the system as a whole and cannot be assigned to a single particle. When one mass is significantly larger, such as in the case of Earth and a falling object, it is valid to approximate that the larger mass does not move, allowing potential energy to be attributed to the smaller mass. To analyze the motion of one particle in relation to another, one should consider the equations of motion in a non-inertial frame. This approach allows for a more accurate understanding of the dynamics within the system.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
Two particles of mass m1 and m2 are released in rest, they are separated by a distance ro, and all motion is by the mutual gravitational attraction. Calc their velocity when their distance is r < ro.
Relevant Equations
All below.
This problem is very easy to solve considering that the two particles belong a closed system under action of conservatives force.

My doubt is if it is possible to solve the problem by consider one particle by time, that is:

Suppose that we know the particle m one is under gravitational force, at first its energy is = -Gm1m2/ro

After certain time, the distance to the central force will be r, and so -Gm1m2/r + m1v²/2.

If we apply E1=E2, it will be wrong! The question is why, since all forces are conservative.

For example, we can say that m2 is like the earth, when we apply to m1 E1=E2 is right, but in this case no.

This make me wonder that E1 = E2 under the gravitational field of the Earth is actually a approximation (yes, good).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LCSphysicist said:
Suppose that we know the particle m one is under gravitational force, at first its energy is = -Gm1m2/ro

After certain time, the distance to the central force will be r, and so -Gm1m2/r + m1v²/2.

Remember that the potential energy ##-\frac{Gm_1 m_2}{r}## is a property of the system (pair) of masses, and cannot be attributed to anyone of the particles individually.

In the special case that one of the masses is significantly larger than the other, you can make the approximation that zero work is done by gravity on the large mass (i.e. it doesn't move) and you can "attribute" all of the potential energy to the smaller mass. This is what we do when considering the "GPE of an object" above the Earth.

If you want to solve it one particle at a time, you might consider looking into the two-body problem. Specifically, try and see if you can form an equation of motion of one body w.r.t. the position of the other body (which occupies a non-inertial frame).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
etotheipi said:
Remember that the potential energy ##-\frac{Gm_1 m_2}{r}## is a property of the system (pair) of masses, and cannot be attributed to anyone of the particles individually.

In the special case that one of the masses is significantly larger than the other, you can make the approximation that zero work is done by gravity on the large mass (i.e. it doesn't move) and you can "attribute" all of the potential energy to the smaller mass. This is what we do when considering the "GPE of an object" above the Earth.

If you want to solve it one particle at a time, you might consider looking into the two-body problem. Specifically, try and see if you can form an equation of motion of one body w.r.t. the position of the other body (which occupies a non-inertial frame).
Woll, that's truth, by working most of the time with two bodies with masses very different, i just forget that the potential energy is property of the system :S, thx
 
You can try this. Let ##\vec{F}_{12} = m_1\ddot{\vec{x}}_1## and ##\vec{F}_{21} = m_2\ddot{\vec{x}}_2## be equations of motion in the inertial (space) frame. Now $$\vec{a}_{21} = \ddot{\vec{x}}_2 - \ddot{\vec{x}}_1 = \frac{1}{m_2}\vec{F}_{21} - \frac{1}{m_1}\vec{F}_{12} = (\frac{1}{m_1} + \frac{1}{m_2})\vec{F}_{21}$$ You end up with $$\vec{F}_{21} = \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\vec{a}_{21} = \mu \vec{a}_{21}$$So now you can let ##\vec{F}_{21} = -\frac{Gm_1 m_2}{r^3}\vec{r}## and solve for the relative motion!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top