Solving a Kirchhoff's Law Problem: Finding the Equation for a Highlighted Path

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninjadrummer8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a Kirchhoff's Law problem involving a fully charged capacitor in an RC circuit. Participants clarify that once the capacitor is fully charged, it behaves like an open circuit, allowing for a simpler analysis of the remaining resistors. The voltage across the capacitor is not zero, contrary to some initial thoughts, and is determined by the voltage divider rule. The correct approach involves applying Kirchhoff's junction rule and setting up a differential equation to find the capacitor voltage over time. Ultimately, the steady-state voltage across the capacitor aligns with expectations from the resistor divider circuit.
ninjadrummer8
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


q4.jpg


This is a simlified version of the problem but I will understand it after this part is explained. The path highlighed in yellow, I need the equation for that path. THE CAPACITOR IS FULLY CHARGED.


Homework Equations


I1=I2+I3 (know how to use this)
sum of the voltages = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


so for the path in yellow:
12 - I1(5ohm) + 12 = 0 ? I'm not 100% sure of what to do at the capacitor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EDIT: At the resistor, V=IR and I=\frac{dQ}{dt}. This is an RC circuit, you need to solve a differential equation and of course at the Capacitor V=\frac{Q}{C}
 
after the capacitor is fully charged, no current will flow through it, so I can totally eliminate that portion of the circuit diagram and it would be a simple circuit with 2 resistors... is that correct? that is just my theory
 
Yes you are correct. The potential difference across the capacitor is 0 since its fully charged.
 
ninjadrummer8 said:
after the capacitor is fully charged, no current will flow through it, so I can totally eliminate that portion of the circuit diagram and it would be a simple circuit with 2 resistors... is that correct? that is just my theory

Exactly. You know that in the DC steady state, the capacitor is just like an open circuit, which means that you have a simple resistor divider circuit.

djeitnstine said:
Yes you are correct. The potential difference across the capacitor is 0 since its fully charged.

No. That makes no sense at all. Think about it from an electrostatics viewpoint. You have a bunch of positive charge on a plate separated in space by a certain distance from an equal amount of negative charge on another plate. What this means is that there will be an electric field (nearly uniform in this case due to the geometry of the plates) and therefore a (NON-ZERO) potential difference (aka voltage) between the plates. Conclusion: the voltage across the capacitor is NOT zero.

From a circuit standpoint, in the steady state, one would expect the voltage at that node to be given by exactly what you would predict from the resistor voltage divider circuit that remains. I.e.:

Vc = V0(R2/(R1 + R2))​

where V0 is the battery voltage and which resistor is which is determined by whatever makes this voltage division formula correct.

If you don't believe me, then by all means set up differential equation. But you have to do it properly, meaning that your starting point should be the equation that you get from Kirchoff's junction rule applied to the node where the capacitor voltage is measured. The result I get for the capacitor voltage as a function of time is:

v_c(t) = \frac{V_0}{R_1 + R_2}R_2\left[1 - \exp\left(-\left(\frac{1}{\tau_1} + \frac{1}{\tau_2}\right) t \right)\right]​

Where τ1 and τ2 = R1C and R2C respectively.

So, in the steady state, the capacitor voltage is exactly what you'd expect from treating it as an open circuit.

Edit: This solution assumes that we "plug in" the battery at time t = 0, i.e. the capacitor starts out initially uncharged because the circuit has no source in it before t = 0.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top