MHB Solving a Practice Exam Question: Arranging Letters in ROCKET

  • Thread starter Thread starter nari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Rocket
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the arrangements of the letters in "ROCKET" with the condition that the vowels E and O must stay together. The correct approach is to treat the vowels as a single unit, resulting in five units to arrange: R, OE, C, K, and T. This leads to the calculation of 5! for the arrangements of these units, while the factor of 2 accounts for the two possible orders of the vowels (EO or OE). The confusion arises from the assumption that only four letters are left after selecting the vowels, but the vowels are treated as one unit in this scenario. Understanding this concept clarifies the reasoning behind the calculation.
nari
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi! There is this question in my practice exam:

How many ways can all the letters in the word ROCKET be arranged so that the vowels are always together?

The answer is 5! x 2.

I understand where the 2 is coming from. What I don't understand is the 5. Shouldn't it be 4!, since we already selected two out of six letters?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nari said:
Hi! There is this question in my practice exam:

How many ways can all the letters in the word ROCKET be arranged so that the vowels are always together?

The answer is 5! x 2.

I understand where the 2 is coming from. What I don't understand is the 5. Shouldn't it be 4!, since we already selected two out of six letters?
Think of the E and the O as being glued together. They then count as a single "letter", and you have 5! ways of arranging the five letters R OE C K and T. The 2 just tells you whether the E comes before or after the O.
 
Opalg said:
Think of the E and the O as being glued together. They then count as a single "letter", and you have 5! ways of arranging the five letters R OE C K and T. The 2 just tells you whether the E comes before or after the O.

So then the options would be: eo/oe + r o/e c k t?
 
nari said:
So then the options would be: eo/oe + r o/e c k t?

I don't quite follow the whole logic here but the beginning part is true, the letter pairs are "eo" or "oe". For simplicity let's just called these two letters P (for pair). Opalg suggested the same thing but maybe seeing it like this will help.

How many ways can you arrange RPCKT?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top