transgalactic said:if what you say is true than the
question must be constructed otherwise
because the derivative of the bottom is NOT what is on TOP??
i saparated them into 2 integrals the second part is the
problematic
because when
i take the whole
1/(e^2x+3) and i and take this as a complex function LAN (as shown in the file)
ln(e^2x+3)/(2*e^2x) it doesn't come out as in the book
what is the law of transforming into lan fuction exept of the case 1/x
i meen in the case of complex function
when i have 1/(something else then simple lenear stuff)?/
Mathgician said:arildno Your solution is incorect.
arildno said:It is perhaps simplest to use the variable change u=e^{x}\to{du}=\frac{du}{u}
D H said:Arildno did fine. He did not solve the problem in full; he left the final steps up to the original poster.
The only problem with Arildno's post is the use of the word "simplest":
It is even simpler to use the variable change
u=e^{2x}\to{dx}=\frac1 {2u}du}
Then
\int\frac{e^{2x}-1}{e^{2x}+3}dx\to<br /> \int\frac1 2\; \frac{u-1}{u(u+3)}du
Decomposing,
\frac1 2\frac{u-1}{u(u+3)} = \frac1 6\left(\frac4{u+3}-\frac1u\right)
which leads to the easily integrable function
\int\frac1 6\left(\frac4{u+3}-\frac1u\right)du
Mathgician said:wrong, on the demominator, you cannot factor out u from 3, a constant. look carefully...
Mathgician said:wrong, on the demominator, you cannot factor out u from 3, a constant. look carefully...
D H said:What are you talking about? The technique is called "partial fraction decomposition". A reference: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PartialFractionDecomposition.html"
It is easy to verify that
\frac1 2\frac{u-1}{u(u+3)} = \frac1 6\left(\frac4{u+3}-\frac1u\right)
The least common denominator of the sum on the left hand side is u(u+3). Expanding the left hand side,
\frac1 6\left(\frac4{u+3}-\frac1u\right) =<br /> \frac1 6\left(\frac4{u+3}-\frac1u\right)\frac{u(u+3)}{u(u+3)} =<br /> \frac1 6\;\frac{4u-(u+3)}{u(u+3)} = \frac1 6\;\frac{3u-3}{u(u+3)} = \frac1 2\frac{u-1}{u(u+3)}
which is of course the right-hand side.
Mathgician said:what I am trying to say is that the substitution does not equate to the original equation if you observe the denominator, it is not hard to spot, very obvious blunder...
arildno said:It is perhaps simplest to use the variable change u=e^{x}\to{dx}=\frac{du}{u}
Then we get:
\int\frac{e^{2x}-1}{e^{2x}+3}dx=\int\frac{u^{2}-1}{(u^{2}+3)u}du
We then use partial fractions decomposition:
\frac{u^{2}-1}{(u^{2}+3)u}=\frac{Au+B}{u^{2}+3}+\frac{C}{u}\to{C}=-\frac{1}{3}, A=\frac{4}{3},B=0
Then your problem is readily solved