Solving a Rowing Kinematics Problem: Finding the Rate of the Current

AI Thread Summary
To solve the rowing kinematics problem, set up equations based on the speed, time, and distance for both upstream and downstream rowing. The upstream speed is the man's speed minus the current, while the downstream speed is the man's speed plus the current. By equating the distances traveled in both directions, you can derive a formula to solve for the current's speed. Simplifying the approach is crucial, as overcomplicating with vectors can hinder problem-solving. The discussion emphasizes the importance of keeping solutions straightforward in physics problems.
Omid
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
A man who can row 4 miles per hour in still water finds that he can row upstream in 7 and 1/2 hours a distance which requires 2 and 1/2 hours to row downstream. Find the rate of the current.

When I saw the problem at once I had dozens of ideas to solve it but all of them failed.
Can you give me some hints ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The most direct way would be setting up the known equations and solve for them.
You have two unknowns, the speed of the current and the distance travelled.
You also have two linearly independent equations:
-The 'speed*time=distance' equation for going upstream
-The 'speed*time=distance' equation for going downstream

The speed when going upstream/downstream is just the speed of the man minus/plus
the speed of the current.
 
Let the current be v. Speed upstream is 4-v and the distance rowed in 7 and 1/2 hours is d= (4-v)(15/2). Speed downstream is 4+v and the distance rowed in 2 and 1/2 hours is (4+v)(5/2). Since those distances are the same, set them equal and solve for v.
 
I was making the problem harder and harder by using relative motion and vectors, ... that's why I couldn't solve it.
I must remember to kiss ( Keep It Simple and Straight forward) , as you did here, when solving physics problems.

Thank you very much
 
You mean it's not "Keep it simple, STUPID"? That's what people always tell ME!
 
HallsofIvy said:
You mean it's not "Keep it simple, STUPID"? That's what people always tell ME!


:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top