Solving a Spring-Block Problem: Find V,H

  • Thread starter Thread starter myk127
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block placed on a compressed spring. The block's mass is 2.0 kg, the spring is compressed by 0.5 m, and the spring constant is 2.50 N/cm. Participants are tasked with finding the velocity of the block as it leaves the spring, its velocity after rising 1.00 m, and the maximum height it can reach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of energy conservation principles, particularly the transformation of spring potential energy into kinetic and gravitational potential energy. There are attempts to clarify the roles of various energy terms in the equations used.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem using energy equations, while others are questioning the definitions of variables and the implications of the problem's setup. There is an ongoing exploration of the change in height and its relation to the spring's compression.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding the reference points for height and the interpretation of the problem's requirements. There is acknowledgment of the need to maintain consistent definitions throughout the calculations.

myk127
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.0 kg block is placed on top of a spring which is compressed 0.5 m. The spring constant of the spring is 2.50 N/cm. when the block is released, find (a) the velocity at which the block leaves the spring (b) the velocity of the block when it has risen 1.00 m (c) the maximum height that the block can reach.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) I tried using the formula W = ΔKE + ΔPE + ΔPEe
since there's no other work done W = 0. I canceled ΔKE because there's no motion in the object at the beginning and at the highest point. then I canceled PE1 because there's no height yet then I canceled PEe2 because it not in contact with the spring anymore. then my formula looked like this:
PEe2 = PE1 -----> ½kx² = mgh

how can i find the initial Velocity with the formula I got? pls tell me I did something wrong or if I forgot any thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do your algebraic values stand for?

For this question [tex]E_{total} = \frac{1}{2}kx^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + mg\Delta h[/tex]

(a) velocity of block leaving spring. This implies all spring potential (.5kx^2) has become gravitational and kinetic. You have all values except for v, shouldn't be too hard to solve for.

(b)block after 1m. This means that once again all energy is gravitational and kinetic, exactly same form as (a) just a different h value.

(c) Once again you use only gravitational and kinetic energy, but let v = 0 and solve for h.

The reason that [tex]\frac{1}{2}kx^2[/tex] is present even though it was not mentioned in any of the guidelines I gave, is that before it is released, all energy is spring potential, therefore you can calculate the total energy of the system.
 
the values I used are:
PEe - spring potential energy
k - spring constant
x - length of elongation or compression
mgh - mass, gravity and height.

sorry if i didn't understand, I'm kind of not good with physics. how come there's still ½mv² in the equation?
 
1/2 mv^2 is in the equation because for parts a) and b) we're solving for v.
for part c) it's not what we're solving for, although it is a part of the total energy in the system so it has to be included. Energy is always conserved.
 
what would be my Δh then?
 
Well have a little think about it. Part (a) is asking for velocity right as it leaves the spring. This implies that the spring is completely extended and there is no more force acting (on its part). However the particle has not moved any further than the end of the spring. Therefore: your change in height is equal to that of the change in spring compression = 0.5m

for part (b) it asks for when it has risen 1m. I am not sure if they mean 1m from when the spring was fully compressed, or 1m above the top of the uncompressed spring (most likely the latter). If it was the case of the latter then your change in height would be 1 + 0.5m because you have earlier defined your gravitational potential to be measured from the top of the compressed spring. Therefore to prevent any errors entering your calculations you must keep this point the same.
 
wow, thanks I never thought of that. part (a) was really my problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K