Solving a University Level EMF Problem: Need Help!

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter monty0423
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf University
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from a university-level electromagnetic fields course, specifically focusing on the application of Ampère's law and the concept of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors. Participants are exploring the implications of symmetry in the context of magnetic flux and the behavior of the magnetic field in relation to the configuration of the conductors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the magnetic flux is zero due to the current through the Amperian loop being zero, leading to the conclusion that the magnetic field B is also zero.
  • Another participant counters that while the closed path integral around a loop may be zero, it does not imply that the magnetic field H is zero everywhere on the path, emphasizing the importance of symmetry.
  • A participant questions whether their reasoning would hold if the conductors were concentric, suggesting that symmetry could simplify the analysis.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of considering both the parallel and perpendicular components of the magnetic field H when applying symmetry.
  • Participants discuss the concept of superposition in relation to the magnetic fields generated by the two opposite currents, noting that the fields do not cancel out due to the non-concentric arrangement of the conductors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of Ampère's law and the implications of symmetry in this context. There is no consensus on the correctness of the initial reasoning presented, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the application of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for additional arguments to support claims about the components of the magnetic field, indicating that assumptions about symmetry and the configuration of the conductors are critical to the analysis.

monty0423
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to solve a problem in university level electromagnetic fields course.
The problem is in the attachment.

My answer is simple, that for the magnetic flux B[itex]\rightarrow[/itex] (vector field B[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]),
the Amperian loop will have a current equivalent to 0 because current through Amperian loop i = I - I = 0.
Therefore, B[itex]\rightarrow[/itex] = 0 because μ0*2*[itex]\pi[/itex]*ρ*B = i = 0.
However, the solution stated that the force will be applied to the right direction.

Could anybody enlighten me with what is wrong with my reasoning?
 

Attachments

  • bowbow.jpg
    bowbow.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 543
Physics news on Phys.org


The closed path integral around a loop may be zero but that doesn't mean H is zero everywhere on the path. Using that sort of information profitably depends on taking advantage of symmetry to say H is the same everywhere around the loop.
 


So basically, my answer would have been correct if the centers of the two conductors in the left were the same, as in, if they were concentric?
How do I apply symmetry in this context?
The B→ is not zero because the superposition, B→ from the two opposite currents don't cancel out with each other due to the current-carrying conductors not being concentric?
 


monty0423 said:
So basically, my answer would have been correct if the centers of the two conductors in the left were the same, as in, if they were concentric?

Yes then you could have argued the component of H *along the path* is the same everywhere on the path and therefore must be zero. You would still have to make another argument (again symmetry) that the perpendicular component of H was also zero. Bits of current density in the cylindrical shell will cause a perpendicular component of B to appear at Ie.

How do I apply symmetry in this context?
The B→ is not zero because the superposition, B→ from the two opposite currents don't cancel out with each other due to the current-carrying conductors not being concentric?

That's right they don't cancel but you have the right idea -- use superposition.

The field due to the wire inside the cylinder is... the field due to the cylindrical conductor is... then add them together. Symmetry will come into play when you have to think about the field due to the cylindrical conductor.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K