Solving Antiphase Wave Homework: Wavelength 633nm

  • Thread starter Thread starter ravsterphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving antiphase waves and their wavelength, specifically focusing on calculating vertical distances related to path differences in wave reflections. The subject area includes wave physics and interference patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of waves being in antiphase and the associated path difference formula. Questions arise regarding the calculation of vertical distances and the interpretation of path lengths for different points of reflection.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about path differences and discussing the implications of phase relationships. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the path difference formula, but there is no explicit consensus on the calculations or interpretations yet.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the integer values used in the path difference formula and how they relate to the physical setup of the problem. The discussion also notes that the light reflected from one point covers a distance twice, which may affect calculations.

ravsterphysics
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


capture1-jpg.110378.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first part I know the wavelength of light is (1.53 x 414nm) = 633nm

But for the second part I'm stumped. Since it's 180 degrees then the waves are in antiphase but I don't understand how to calculate the vertical distance?? (If antiphase then the path difference is (n+0.5)(lambda) )
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.JPG
    Capture1.JPG
    33.6 KB · Views: 628
Physics news on Phys.org
Waves going to A and getting reflected there to get back to the emitter take a longer path than waves getting reflected at B. How much longer?
ravsterphysics said:
(If antiphase then the path difference is (n+0.5)(lambda) )
That formula is useful.
 
mfb said:
Waves going to A and getting reflected there to get back to the emitter take a longer path than waves getting reflected at B. How much longer?
That formula is useful.

I've taken another look but I'm still confused. Can you help out?

Since it's 180 degrees out of phase then that means it's half a wavelength behind so n would be 0.5, right?
 
n is always an integer. the "0.5" are added to n already.

Person X and Y both start at the same place. Person X goes to point B and back to the start. Person Y goes to point A, which is a distance d behind point B, and then goes back to the start. What is the difference in the path lengths of person X and Y?

The difference from above is equal to (n+0.5)(lambda) for some integern n. Which integer n leads to the smallest distance d?
 
ravsterphysics said:

(If antiphase then the path difference is (n+0.5)(lambda) )

Dude, that's the answer.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
Dude, that's the answer.
P.s. Don't forget that the light reflected from A covers the distance between A and B twice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
56K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K