Solving Binary Star Problems: Tips & Strategies

  • Thread starter Thread starter tarkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary Stars
tarkin
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://prntscr.com/dsd7ea

Image attached

Homework Equations


For circular orbit, r = Pv / 2 pi , Where P = orbital period and v=orbital velocity

r' = r sini , where i is unknown angle to plane of sky.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I'm really not getting these binary problems at all.

I would start by finding v, but how is this from them "the observed maximum velocity shift of 26.1 km/s" ?
Then I would use r = Pv / 2 pi , and the separation would just be 2r as they are identical stars, is this right?
I don't know where to start with the angle of inclination part.

Also, in my notes, talking about binaries in general, it says that r1 + r2 = a
I think that's r1= radius of star 1, r2 = radius of star 2, a = true semi-major orbital axis, but I don't understand this, how could the 2 radii total the semi-major axis? Surely it would be 2a if anything?
And talking about the semi-major axis, does the system actually have a semi-major axis? I thought there was just one for each star.

Really lost here, any help would be appreicated, thanks!
 

Attachments

  • binarystarq.jpg
    binarystarq.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll have to consider the masses of the stars to get the orbital velocity. The period and the radial velocity alone are not sufficient.

You can consider the semi-major axis of each star, or the semi-major axis of the distance between the stars. But for a circular orbit with identical masses, you can just take the radius of the circle as semi-major axis of each star. This is NOT the distance between the stars!
 
Try using Kepler's third law to find ##a##.
 
Thanks guys, it was Kepler's 3rd that I needed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top