Solving Cable Tension Question with Proportion

  • Thread starter Thread starter jw2007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the necessary spacer length to increase cable locking tension from 1200 psi to between 1250 psi and 1400 psi. The current spacer length is .994 inches, and the proposed new length is 1.079 inches, which is derived from a proportional calculation. The calculation assumes a constant spring coefficient for the steel cable, indicating a linear relationship between spacer length and tension. The conclusion is that the linear approximation is valid due to the low stress compared to the yield strength of steel, suggesting the new setup will achieve the desired tension. Overall, the approach appears sound for the intended application.
jw2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a locking device with a cable running through it (think of pieces of PVC pipe with a cable through them). I apply pressure and pull on one end of the cable tightening it and pulling the pieces together so I can lock it with a cam device. To lock it presently it requires 1200 psi (hydraulic pressure) applied to the cable (tension). There is a spacer block .994" long that I pull the cam lock past to get to 1200 psi. I need to increase the locking tension to between 1250 psi and 1400 psi. I need to determine the length of the new spacer. I intend to calculate this as a proportion since the cable, which is steel, I believe should have a constant spring coefficient. My calculation for my next move is as follows:

I plan to add a spacer that is an additional .085" in length making the overall spacer length 1.079"

.994"/1200 psi = 1.079"/X psi

X = 1.079"(1200 psi/.994")

X= 1302.615 psi

Does this make sense?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming that everything is linear this makes sense. If we were talking about a rigid bar then since it is a low stress, you should definitely be in the linear range. I think you should end up close enough to what you want.
 
The stress is negligible compared to the yield strength of steel. A linear approximation is appropriate.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top