Solving Catching a Fastball Problem | Force, Mass & Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter mastac741
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A baseball catcher is trying to calculate the average force acting on his mitt when catching a fastball thrown at 43 m/s with a mass of 0.15 kg. Initially, the calculations were incorrect due to neglecting the acceleration of the ball as it comes to rest in the glove. By recognizing that there is indeed an acceleration in the negative x-direction, the correct approach to find the time interval and force can be established. After adjusting the logic, the calculations can yield the accurate average force. Understanding the dynamics involved is crucial for solving this physics problem effectively.
mastac741
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem I'm having trouble with:

A baseball catcher is catching a fastball that is thrown at 43 m/s by the pitcher. If the mass of the ball is .15kg and if the catcher moves his mitt backward toward his body by 8.0 cm as the ball lands in the glove, what is the magnitude of the average force acting on the catcher's mitt? Estimate the time interval required for the catcher to move his hands.

OK, so this is how I solved it(tried to solve it). I got it wrong, so something's wrong with my logic, so please try to point it out.

Vo = 43 m/s
m = .15 kg

p = mv = (.15) (43) = 6.45 N/s = Fav (Delta) t

I need to find t, so I use x-x0 = Voxt (no acceleration on the ball, and no acceleration acting in the x direction). I find that t = .0186 sec (which is wrong). I divide 6.45 by .0186 sec to get Fav to = 346.8 N (which also is wrong).

Some help would be appreciated.

Mastac741
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mastac741 said:
I need to find t, so I use x-x0 = Voxt (no acceleration on the ball, and no acceleration acting in the x direction).

But there obviously is an acceleration on the ball in the x-direction. If there weren't, the ball would never come to rest in the glove.
 
gotcha

Right you are. If I account for the acceleration in the -x direction I get the right answer. Thanks for filling in my logic gaps.

Mastac741
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top