Solving Cauchy Residual Theorem for Holomorphic Function at z=2i

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alekon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Theorem
Alekon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright so I posted a picture asking the exact question.

Here is my best attempt...

According to my professor's terrible notes, the numerator can magically turn into the form:

e^i(z+3)

when converted to complex. The denominator will be factored into

(z-2i)(z+2i)

but the function is only holomorphic at z=2i so only (z+2i) can be used.

From there the Res(f,2i)=g(2i) which is equal to what I believe is something like

e^(i(2i+3)/(4i)

It follows that

J=e^(-2+3i)*Pi

and sovling for the real part gives me an incorrect answer.

I might be missing some steps but I'm going off a theorem and it's really hard to relate to this problem. Help me PLEASE!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    6 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it 0.00477463?
 
This is $$\frac{\sin (3)}{4 e^2}$$

Let me know if this is the answer. I can explain how i got it.
 
I finally calculated the answer... it turned out to be -0.2

See the picture if you're interested
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    14.6 KB · Views: 468
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top