Solving Characteristic Frequencies of Coupled Mass-Spring System

In summary, the problem involves finding the characteristic frequencies and modes of vibration for a coupled mass-spring system. Using Newton's second law, equations for the accelerations of the masses were derived and rearranged to solve for the eigenvalues. However, there was an error in the initial equations, which was resolved by considering the forces acting on the first mass. The final equations for the accelerations were found to be -3kx + 2ky and -3ky + 2kx, and the next step is to solve for the eigenvalues and eigen vectors to determine the characteristic frequencies and modes of vibration.
  • #1
BOAS
552
19
Hello,

I have a problem regarding the characteristic frequencies of a coupled mass-spring system. I have made some relevant progress, but I'm unsure of where to go from here.

1. Homework Statement


Find the characteristic frequencies and the two characteristic modes of vibration if the central spring constant in the following diagram (attached) is 2k.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Using Newton's second law, I have written the following two equations for x and y.

##m \ddot{x} = - kx - 2k(y - x) = kx - 2ky##
##m \ddot{y} = - ky - 2k(y - x) = ky + 2kx##

Rearranging for accelerations;

##\ddot{x} = \frac{k}{m} x - \frac{2k}{m} y##
##\ddot{y} = \frac{2k}{m} x + \frac{k}{m} y##

I'm not sure how to do matrices properly in LaTeX, but I write the above as a matrix and solve for the Eigen values. If I call the coefficient matrix ##A## then ##A_{11} = 1##, ##A_{12} = -2##, ##A_{21} = 2##, ##A_{22} = 1##.

Using the fact that ##\det (A - \mu I) = 0## I find that ##\mu = 1 \pm 2i##

Using this fact I find my eigen vectors to be ##\vec e_{1} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\-i\end{array}\right)## and ##\vec e_{2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\i\end{array}\right)##

I think the next step is for me to write out the diagonalised matrix, with the eigen values as the entries top left and bottom right.

##\left(\begin{array}{c}\ddot{X}\\\ddot{Y}\end{array}\right) = \frac{k}{m} \left(\begin{array}{c}1 - 2i & 0\\\ 0 & 1 + 2i\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}X\\ Y\end{array}\right)##

This gives me two differential equations;

##\ddot{X} = (1-2i)X##
##\ddot{Y} = (1+2i)Y##

I'm concerned about my complex eigenvalues and think I have gone wrong somewhere, but I can't find an obvious mistake.

Please can somebody take a look and help me to understand where to go from here.

Thank you very much,

BOAS.

Edit - Figured out how to write matrices
 

Attachments

  • spring.pdf
    20.3 KB · Views: 195
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
BOAS said:
Hello,

I have a problem regarding the characteristic frequencies of a coupled mass-spring system. I have made some relevant progress, but I'm unsure of where to go from here.

1. Homework Statement


Find the characteristic frequencies and the two characteristic modes of vibration if the central spring constant in the following diagram (attached) is 2k.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Using Newton's second law, I have written the following two equations for x and y.

##m \ddot{x} = - kx - 2k(y - x) = kx - 2ky##
##m \ddot{y} = - ky - 2k(y - x) = ky + 2kx##

Rearranging for accelerations;

##\ddot{x} = \frac{k}{m} x - \frac{2k}{m} y##
##\ddot{y} = \frac{2k}{m} x + \frac{k}{m} y##

Try the special case of ##y = 0##. Does it look right?
 
  • #3
PeroK said:
Try the special case of ##y = 0##. Does it look right?

If ##y = 0##

My initial equation is ##\ddot{x} = \frac{k}{m}x## which does not look right at all.

If I displace the first mass by a small distance x, it feels a force due to the first spring ##F_{1} = -kx##. It will feel another force, whose direction depends on the position of y, due to the second spring. ##F_{2} = 2k(y-x)## and a third force due to the final spring, whose direction depends on y, ##F_{3} = ky##

This gives me ##\ddot{x} = -3kx + 3ky## which makes sense in the case of y=0, because the first mass will feel a force (when displaced) due to the left and center spring in the same direction.

Thank you,

I can do the same for y and try again at this problem. :)
 
  • #4
BOAS said:
If ##y = 0##

My initial equation is ##\ddot{x} = \frac{k}{m}x## which does not look right at all.

If I displace the first mass by a small distance x, it feels a force due to the first spring ##F_{1} = -kx##. It will feel another force, whose direction depends on the position of y, due to the second spring. ##F_{2} = 2k(y-x)## and a third force due to the final spring, whose direction depends on y, ##F_{3} = ky##

This gives me ##\ddot{x} = -3kx + 3ky## which makes sense in the case of y=0, because the first mass will feel a force (when displaced) due to the left and center spring in the same direction.

Thank you,

I can do the same for y and try again at this problem. :)

That's not correct. You were close the first time. Try a +ve x and y (with, say, x > y) and look at what the springs are doing
 
  • #5
PeroK said:
That's not correct. You were close the first time. Try a +ve x and y (with, say, x > y) and look at what the springs are doing
Ah, I believe I have found my mistake.

##m \ddot{x} = -3kx + 2ky##

Originally, I was forcing the direction with a minus sign, which was actually already accounted for with the (y-x) term.
 
  • #6
BOAS said:
Ah, I believe I have found my mistake.

##m \ddot{x} = -3kx + 2ky##

Originally, I was forcing the direction with a minus sign, which was actually already accounted for with the (y-x) term.

The third spring (on the right) cannot affect the first mass, which is pushed and pulled by the first two springs only.
 
  • #7
PeroK said:
The third spring (on the right) cannot affect the first mass, which is pushed and pulled by the first two springs only.

I agree. The reasoning behind my expression is as follows;

If I displace the first mass by an amount x, it will feel a force due to spring 1 of ##F_{1} = -kx##. It will feel a second force due to the middle spring (which has twice the spring constant) of ##F_{2} = 2k(y - x)##. This is because the extension/compression of the central spring is dependent upon the position of y. If y < x, the force pushes x back to it's equilibrium position and vice versa.
 
  • #8
BOAS said:
I agree. The reasoning behind my expression is as follows;

If I displace the first mass by an amount x, it will feel a force due to spring 1 of ##F_{1} = -kx##. It will feel a second force due to the middle spring (which has twice the spring constant) of ##F_{2} = 2k(y - x)##. This is because the extension/compression of the central spring is dependent upon the position of y. If y < x, the force pushes x back to it's equilibrium position and vice versa.

In the diagram you posted, all three springs have the same constant ##k##.
 
  • #9
PeroK said:
In the diagram you posted, all three springs have the same constant ##k##.

True, but in the question I posted, I did specify that the central spring has twice the constant.

I apologise for causing any problems.
 
  • #10
BOAS said:
True, but in the question I posted, I did specify that the central spring has twice the constant.

I apologise for causing any problems.

Okay. Hopefully you'll get some real eigenthings now.
 
  • Like
Likes BOAS
  • #11
PeroK said:
Okay. Hopefully you'll get some real eigenthings now.

Thank you for your help.
 

Related to Solving Characteristic Frequencies of Coupled Mass-Spring System

1. What is a coupled mass-spring system?

A coupled mass-spring system is a physical system composed of multiple masses connected by springs. The motion of one mass affects the motion of the others due to the springs' connections.

2. How do you determine the characteristic frequencies of a coupled mass-spring system?

The characteristic frequencies of a coupled mass-spring system can be determined by solving the equations of motion for the system, which involve calculating the natural frequencies of each mass-spring component and considering their interactions with each other.

3. What are the applications of solving characteristic frequencies of coupled mass-spring systems?

Solving characteristic frequencies of coupled mass-spring systems is useful in understanding the behavior of complex mechanical systems, such as buildings, bridges, and machines. It can also be applied in fields such as acoustics, optics, and electronics.

4. How does damping affect the characteristic frequencies of a coupled mass-spring system?

Damping, which is the dissipation of energy in a system, can change the characteristic frequencies of a coupled mass-spring system. It reduces the amplitude of oscillations and can shift the natural frequencies of the system.

5. Are there any limitations to solving characteristic frequencies of coupled mass-spring systems?

There can be limitations in solving characteristic frequencies of coupled mass-spring systems, as it requires assumptions and simplifications to be made in the equations. Additionally, the accuracy of the results can be affected by factors such as non-linearities and external forces acting on the system.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
105
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
720
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
754
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
465
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
290
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
960
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
256
Back
Top