Solving Collisions in 2 Dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a two-dimensional collision problem involving two pucks of different masses. The first puck, initially at rest, is struck by the second puck moving along the x-axis. Conservation of momentum is emphasized, requiring the calculation of momentum components in both the x and y directions after the collision. The equations derived from the conservation of momentum are set up to find the velocity of the first puck after the collision, incorporating trigonometric functions for the angle of the second puck's trajectory. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding vector quantities and their components in collision scenarios.
Shadow_C316
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 0.321 kg puck, initially at rest on a horizon-
tal, frictionless surface, is struck by a 0.227 kg
puck moving initially along the x-axis with
a speed of 2.51 m/s. After the collision, the
0.227 kg puck has a speed of 1.51 m/s at an
angle of 31 degrees to the positive x axis.
Determine the velocity of the 0.321 kg puck
after the collision. Answer in units of m/s.

Homework Equations



Final Momentum in the x direction=Original Momentum in the x direction

The Attempt at a Solution



I do not understand collisions at all. My teacher didn't go over this and reading about this online is confusing the hell out of me, especially since I can't find an example of hitting something at rest and going off at an angle online so I have no idea how I'm supposed to solve this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No octopus?
 
Why would there be an octopus?
 
A sketch showing the overall geometry would be a good start. Momentum has both magnitude and direction, thus momentum is a vector quantity. When we deal with momentum equations we need to keep in mind that we are working with vector equations.

For this problem and assuming momentum is conserved, the before colision momentum and the after colision momentums will be equal. This is indicated as follows:

\underbrace{m_1 \cdot v^b_1 + m_{2}\cdot v^{b}_{2}}_{Before\;Colision} = \underbrace{m_{1}\cdot v^{a}_{1} + m_{2}\cdot v^{a}_{2}}_{After \; Colision}

The superscripts indicate efore and [a]fter the colision values.

Consider the "before colision" side of the equation. The problem itself gives "A 0.321 kg puck, initially at rest on a horizontal, frictionless surface, is struck by a 0.227 kg puck moving initially along the x-axis with a speed of 2.51 m/s." Therefore:

m_1 \cdot v^b_1 = 0 \; and the before colision momentum is:
m_2\cdot v^b_2 \; Which is a vector directed along the x-axis.

Consider the "after colision" side of the equation. The problem indicates "After the collision, the 0.227 kg puck has a speed of 1.51 m/s at an angle of 31 degrees to the positive x axis." This puck has a momentum vector given as:

m_2\cdot v^a_2 \;

However, this momentum vector is oriented at 31 degrees which means it will have x and y components (that you will have to figure out). Hint: The \sin and \cos functions may be of some use here.

The other mass, m1 will also have a momentum vector as a result of the colision. Which is m_1 \cdot v^a_1\;\; directed at some unknown angle. Let's call that angle \vartheta. Again, x and y componets of this vector are required.

If we project all the "before colision" and all "after colision" vectors to the coordinate axes x and y and apply the conservation of momentum equation along each axis we'll end up with 2 equations "x-axis" momentum and "y-axis" momentum which will look like:

x-axis \{ m_2 \cdot v^b_2 = m_2 \cdot v^a_2\cos{31} + m_1 \cdot v^a_1\cos{\vartheta} \}

y-axis \{ 0 = m_2 \cdot v^a_2\sin{31} + m_1 \cdot v^a_1\sin{\vartheta} \}

I've probably said to much already but assign the variables as follows:
m_1 =0.321 kg
v^{b}_{1} = 0.0 m/s
m_2 = 0.227 kg
v^{b}_{2} = 2.51 m/s

v^{a}_{2} = 1.51 m/s

Solve the equations however you care to (simultaneously) and there you go...

I'm not sure why latex is generating a white background? perhaps one of the moderators could help ?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top