Solving Complex If/Then Statements

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwpoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving complex logical statements using if/then constructs, specifically using symbols for logical operators. The user initially struggles with the premises and seeks assistance in separating and understanding them. After clarification, it is revealed that the statements are part of a logical proof involving rules of inference and replacement. The user eventually arrives at a solution through a series of logical deductions, demonstrating the application of conjunction, distribution, and simplification. The thread highlights the process of navigating through logical proofs and the importance of recognizing applicable rules.
qwpoi
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
This is driving me nuts. I'm sure the answer is completely obvious.

I'm using > for the if A then B b/c there's no keyboard symbol for that, and * for the and operator because same reason.

1. B v (S*N)
2. B > ~S
3. S > ~ N / B v W

I have no idea what to do with these if/then statements, how to separate them, or anything, because I can't get any of the premises by themselves from the first statement.

Please help? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what your question is. Are these three statements the hypotheses and you want to decide what you can prove from them? Are they steps in a proof any you want to decide what you conclude? Is the last step the conclusion and you want to know if the argument is valid? What is it you want to know?
 
Sorry, should have explained more. It's a logical proof, and we have so far learned the a bunch of rules of inference and replacement. I had an epiphany in class though that I was forgetting one rule, and so was able to do it.

solution:
1. B v (S*N)
2. B > ~S
3. S > ~ N / B v W
4. (B>~S) * (S>~N) 2, 3 Conj
5. (BvS)*(BvN) 1 dist
6. BvS 5, simp
7. ~Sv~N 4, 6 CD
8. ~(S*N) DM 7
9. (S*N)vB 1 comm
10. B 8, 9 DS
11. BvW add 10
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top