Solving Currents & Magnets Practical Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pioneer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Magnets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a practical experiment involving the magnetic force on a current-carrying conductor, where negative values for force were obtained. These negative values may indicate that the direction of the magnetic field was reversed during the experiment. Using these negative values in graphing could lead to incorrect results, emphasizing the need for consistent magnetic field direction across all parts of the experiment. The relationship derived for force, F = KnIL, incorporates current, number of magnets, length, and a constant of proportionality. Ensuring the magnetic field direction is consistent is crucial for accurate data interpretation.
Pioneer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm stucked on a practical in which I was supposed to find out how the magnetic force on a current carrying conductor depends on its length, current through it and the magentic field strength. After this I was supposed to plot 3 graphs.

Well, I carried out the expt. using a current balance but when I conducted the expt, which had 3 different parts, I got -ve values for (F1 - F0), which is proportional to the force exerted. NB. F1 is the weight of the magnet assembly with current flowing and obviously F0 is the weight without current flowing. Did I get negative values for force because the direction of the magnetic field was reversed? Also, If I use the -ve values, wouldn't my results obtained from the graphs be incorrect? NB. Also, I had to find out what F was by combining the 3 different parts. I.e, I had to find F in terms of I, n (no. of magnets), L and K (constant of proportionality), which I found to be F = KnIL. Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is possible that you got negative values for force because the direction of the magnetic field was reversed. It is also possible that your results obtained from the graphs could be incorrect if the negative values are used. To ensure accuracy, you should make sure that the direction of the magnetic field is consistent in all three parts of the experiment. If the direction of the magnetic field is reversed, then the negative force values should be discarded and only the positive values should be used.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top