Solving D'alembert Equation for Wave eq. u(4,1) & u(1,4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajax2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    D'alembert
ajax2000
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a wave equation, utt-uxx=0, 0<x< ∞
u(0,t)=t^2, t>0
u(x,0)=x^2, 0<x< ∞
ut(x,0)=6x, 0<x< ∞

evaulate u(4,1) and u(1,4)

uxx is taking 2 derivatives in respective of x




Homework Equations



D'alembert's equation u=(f(x+ct)+f(x-ct))/2 + (1/ct)(∫g(s)ds

The Attempt at a Solution



this seems easy, just plug everything into the formula to get u(4,1)=u(1,4)=24, however,
at u(1,4) when you evaluate f(1-4) that gives you f(-3) which is out of the boundary in the initial condition for x. how do you re-structure another equation so this would work? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
New territory for me, so what follows may be nonsense, but:

I get u(x,t) = (1/2){(x-t)2 + (x+t)2 + ∫6s ds} with lower limit x-t and upper limit x+t.

So u(1,4) = (1/2){(1-4)2 + (1+4)2 + 48} = whatever.

I guess I don't see where x > 0 is violated anywhere. Of course, x - ct can be negative & is in this instance (c = 1).

Ref: http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~alan/MT2003/PDE/node12.html
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top