Solving Decay & Parity Problem with J=1 & Spin 1/2 Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter erwinscat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Parity
erwinscat
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all ! I was trying to solve the following problem : you have a particle with spin J=1 and unknown parity that decays into 2 indentical particles of spin = 1/2

We want to know how much the angular momentum of the final state is and also the final total spin.

Now, my reasonment was the following.

Stot_final = either 0 or 1 since it is the vector sum of the spin of both identical final particles.

Knowing that |L-S|<=J<= L+S we have to cases but I assumed that J=1 is conserved in the decay but it wasn't told so ...

we would have

for S=0 => L= 1
for S=1 => L= (0,1,2)

knowing that the final particles are indentical they must have a antisymmetric wave function due to Fermi Dirac...and so L must be odd . => L=1

but we still have to cases (S,L)= (0,1) or (1,1) if J=1 was to be conserved I'd say th only possible is (0,1) but the solutions say the only possibile solution knowing that J=1 is (1,1) ..

Conclusion, I don't know where I'm mistaking !

Any help would be appreciated ! Maybe I shouldn't assume that J was conserved...

Thanks in advance !
Erwin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J is conserved and equals 1.
But,
"knowing that the final particles are indentical they must have a antisymmetric wave function due to Fermi Dirac...and so L must be odd . => L=1"
is wrong.
The spinXorbital wave function must be antisymmetric.
This means that S=0 goes with L=0 or 2, neither of which can give J=1.
Therefor S=1, and L=1, with 1+1=1.
 
Hi and thanks a lot for the answer !

There is still something I don't get .. how do you get L=0 or L=2 with S=0 and more how do you get J=1 = L+S = 1+1 ?? if L=1 and S= 1 shouldn't you get in this case 0 or 2 . (L-S or L+S)?

Isn't this correct :

|L-S|<= 1<= L+S

if S= 0 then you have L=1
if S=1 then you have L= 0,1,2 ?

I guess not since you just said so ...but why isn't that so , where is my mistake ?

Thanks in advance !
Erwin
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top