Solving Diffusion Question: Estimating Time for Uniform Mixture

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryan Hillier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffusion
Ryan Hillier
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1.
Homework Statement Question
This is an experiment on a dilute isotopic mixture of helium gas. A spherical vessel of
diameter 1 m is first filled with 4He gas to one atmosphere pressure. Then a small
amount of 3He gas is introduced through a valve on one side of the vessel. Make a
rough estimate of how long one must wait before a uniform mixture has formed (use
the result for the time dependence of the root mean square travel distance in a
random walk in 1D.) Suggest a better way to make a uniform mixture.

Homework Equations



Area = pi (diameter/2)^2 , pv =nrt , ficks law of diffusion , Mass flux = 1/3lv

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure where to start from. I am reading about fick's law of diffusion right now however I'd love tobe pointed out in the right direction.

Since the question asks for time dependence then isn't second law the most obvious equation to use ?
edit: hm.. as i was reading i came across this idea.. how about i get the area first, then divide volume by area to give me the 'length' which i can plug into ficks equation if I am not mistaken.
Appreciate your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you need a length, there is one given in the problem statement: 1 meter. A factor of 2 does not matter here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top