Solving DS for Line Integral: 5x^2 + 3y^2 = 4

Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Say I have a line integral which I have simplified to:

\int\int x+y dS

Over some surface S, let's say 5x^2 + 3y^2 = 4 or something. Having arrived at this step, how do I determine dS? The formulas and methods we've been taught doesn't really lead to this step all that often but I'd like to know a general approach for determining dS when it is in this form.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have ##dS## it is rather surface integral, not line one.
 
Here's a discussion on surface integrals:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gauss M.D. said:

Homework Statement



Say I have a line integral which I have simplified to:

\int\int x+y dS

Over some surface S, let's say 5x^2 + 3y^2 = 4 or something. Having arrived at this step, how do I determine dS? The formulas and methods we've been taught doesn't really lead to this step all that often but I'd like to know a general approach for determining dS when it is in this form.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


You parameterize the surface with two parameters, say ##u## and ##v##. So you have$$
\vec R(u,v) =\langle x(u,v), y(u,v), z(u,v)\rangle$$Then express your integral in terms of ##u## and ##v## with ##dS = |\vec R_u \times \vec R_v|dudv## with appropriate ##u,v## limits.

In your example you could let ##z## be itself, solve the surface equation for ##x## in terms of ##y## and use ##z## and ##y## for your parameters. The actual integral for your example, which I'm guessing you just made up, might get ugly. If your example was circular instead of elliptical you might use cylindrical coordinates ##z,\theta## for your parameters.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top