Solving Dynamics Questions: Newton's Third Law Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter darksoulzero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a father pulling his child on a sled, Newton's Third Law is illustrated through the interaction between the father, sled, and ground. The father exerts a force on the sled, while the sled exerts an equal and opposite force back on him. However, the father can still move forward because his feet push against the ground, which in turn pushes him forward, creating a net force. The sled accelerates due to the force exerted by the father, while the father also accelerates because of the ground's reaction force. Understanding these action-reaction pairs clarifies how both the father and sled can move despite the equal forces they exert on each other.
darksoulzero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A father is pulling his child on a sled in the snow. How is it possible that the father can pull the child and sled forward according to Newton's Third Law.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the basic concept of this law,but when it is applied I don't really understand how to explain.
What I think is occurring is that the sled and the father is an action-reaction pair and the father is able to move the sled because of another action-reaction pair between the father's foot and the ground. The sled moves because when the father walks his feet exert a force on the ground and the ground exerts a force back onto the father that allows him to move himself as well as the sled with his child on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not bad. :approve:

The key is to understand that just because the father and the sled exert equal and opposite forces on each other that doesn't mean that those forces produce equilibrium: The forces act on different objects.

Look at each 'system' in turn:
The sled: There's a force on it due to the father pulling it. Since there's a net force on it, it accelerates.
The father: The sled pulls back on the father, but the ground pushes him forward. Since there's a net force on him, he can accelerate.
The 'sled + father' as a whole: There's an external force of the ground acting on the system, so it can accelerate.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top