Solving EM Wave Questions: Polarization, Direction, Phase Velocity, Amplitude

AwesomeTrains
Messages
115
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Hey, I've been given this EM-wave:
(-2\vec{e}_x+2\sqrt{3}\vec{e}_y+3\vec{e}_z)E_0e^{i[\omega t-a(\sqrt{3}x+y)]} with a∈ℝ

1) Describe the wave and how it's polarized.
2) In what direction does the wave propagate?
3) What is the phase velocity of the wave?
4) What is the amplitude?
5) Is it a transverse wave?

2. Homework Equations

1: Plane wave equation:
E_0cos(wt-\vec{k}\vec{r}+\phi_0) and e^{ix}=cos(x)+isin(x)
3: Phase velocity:
v_{ph}=\frac{\omega}{k}

The Attempt at a Solution


1) I think it's a plane wave. With Euler's formula I get
(-2\vec{e}_x+2\sqrt{3}\vec{e}_y+3\vec{e}_z)E_0[cos(\omega t-a(\sqrt{3}x+y))+isin(\omega t-a(\sqrt{3}x+y))]
I guess (-2\vec{e}_x+2\sqrt{3}\vec{e}_y+3\vec{e}_z)E_0cos(\omega t-a(\sqrt{3}x+y)) is what I have to look at?

I'm really not sure about the polarization of the wave. My best guess is that it's linearly polarized, because all 3 directions have the same phase at all times.

2) I would say it moves in the direction of \vec{k}=a(\sqrt{3},1,0) in the x-y plane? (I can assume that the wave propagates in vacuum when it's not stated?)

3) v_{ph}=\frac{\omega}{|\vec{k}|}=\frac{\omega}{2|a|} Can I calculate the frequency (\omega) by what is given? Or is it c since it's in vacuum. Is it in vacuum?
(v_{ph}=\frac{\omega}{k}=\frac{\lambda2\pi ν}{2\pi}=c)
4) Pretty sure about this one:
5E_0

5) I've read that transverse waves are waves that are oscillating perpendicular to the direction of propagation.
And I've heard that this is a transverse wave. But (-2,2\sqrt{3},3) is perpendicular to \vec{k}=a(\sqrt{3},1,0) only when a=1 or 0 and not for all a?

Sorry for all the questions in the post :confused: I really appreciate any answers or corrections :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You seems sound for the most part. Given the form of the wave (no absorption or anything like that), it seems to be in a vacuum with a dispersion relation ω = c k.
For question 5, think about the dot product.
 
DelcrossA said:
You seems sound for the most part. Given the form of the wave (no absorption or anything like that), it seems to be in a vacuum with a dispersion relation ω = c k.
For question 5, think about the dot product.

Thanks for the reply :)
The dot product between \vec{k}=a(\sqrt3,1,0) and (-2,2\sqrt3,3) is a(-2)\sqrt3+2a\sqrt3+0=0 => \vec{k} \perp (-2,2\sqrt3,3) oh yea I see my mistake now, it works for all a. Thanks :)
Beside that is the rest correct?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top